Rethinking El Cerrito’s Library Expansion: A Community Approach

A recent East Bay Times article highlights the undeniable challenges facing El Cerrito’s public library: it’s overcrowded, outdated, and seismically unsafe. No one disputes that the current facility falls short of what the community deserves (see the full article here).

But the article stops short of asking an equally important question—what’s the most responsible and sustainable way to meet this need?

City leaders and advocates have reignited calls for a brand-new, state-of-the-art library, potentially funded through a new parcel tax. But let’s be honest: this isn’t the first time we’ve heard this pitch. Voters have rejected multiple funding attempts in the past, not because they’re afraid to invest in the community—but because they’re demanding common sense and fiscal responsibility.

As former Mayor Greg Lyman put it: “We aren’t afraid to tax ourselves”. What he’s missing:

We are already overtaxed!

El Cerrito residents are becoming common-sense voters. We aren’t anti-library. We are actually anti-overtaxing. We are open to solutions—especially ones that don’t require another round of tax increases layered on top of already sky‑high rates. Property taxes, sales taxes, and utility user taxes—El Cerrito ranks among the highest-taxed cities in Contra Costa County. And yet, here we are again, being told a new tax is the only way forward.

But it’s not. Other options deserve equal, if not greater, attention:

• Build on City‑Owned Land: The city already owns several parcels. Why isn’t the conversation focused on lower‑cost alternatives on land we don’t have to rent ?
• Partner with the County: Contra Costa County is responsible for library operations. Let’s explore how the County can contribute more meaningfully to the solution, including capital support.
• Modernize, Don’t Monumentalize: The need is real, but we must distinguish between a functional library and a vanity project. Smart, efficient design can serve the community without breaking the bank.

These practical alternatives are notably absent from the recent coverage. Instead, we’re once again being funneled into a narrative that equates civic pride with unlimited spending—and assumes the only obstacle is voter reluctance.

Here’s the truth: El Cerrito voters have shown time and again that they are willing to invest in the community. But trust and accountability must come first. The city has struggled with budget deficits, pension liabilities, and inconsistent financial transparency. Asking residents to dig deeper without a solid, sustainable plan is shortsighted at best.

Suppose city leaders are serious about delivering a modern library for El Cerrito. In that case, it’s time to have a broader conversation—one that begins with financial realism, incorporates community-driven options, and prioritizes the long-term fiscal health of our city without new taxes.

We can do better. We just have to be willing say no to bad proposals from the City and elect members of the community who will be more responsible.