At the Tuesday City Council meeting in El Cerrito, the community turnout was significant, with many attendees eager to share their thoughts on the Israel-Hamas ceasefire. The anticipation in the air shifted as the mayor announced a reduction in speaking time from three minutes to a brisk two. As speakers reached the new time limit, the City Clerk rigorously enforced the cutoff, sometimes even silencing the microphone. Amidst this, a chilling voice threatened speakers to vacate the podium promptly.
After more than fifteen individuals voiced their concerns, the council members remained silent, adhering to what seems to be a policy of not responding post-public commentary. This silence resonates on multiple levels, unsettlingly so. Attendees, having prepared remarks for the standard three-minute duration, found themselves constrained, a move that could fluster even the most skilled orators. Whereas it’s common for City Clerks to grant a brief grace period beyond allotted comment times, this City Clerk strictly enforced the two-minute cutoff without exception. Allowing for a gentle reminder to conclude remarks, given the reduction, would have been a far more humane approach.
Adding insult to injury, a notable deviation occurred when a presumed insider brought up the November ballot’s tax measure. Unlike the usual non-responsive stance, the council engaged with this speaker, breaking the two-minute rule. This selective interaction exposes a concerning inconsistency in the council’s engagement with the public, reinforcing perceptions of bias and favoritism.
This episode sheds light on why public trust in the council has deteriorated. The arbitrary enforcement of rules and selective engagement highlight a disconcerting disregard for community voices, underlining the need for transparency and consistency in public governance. The council’s actions, or lack thereof, serve as a stark reminder of the importance of equitable treatment and the fundamental role of public trust in democratic institutions.
El Cerrito Committee for Responsible Government (ECCRG) 
The City Council should not get involved in foreign policy. Everyone has opinions, but few have the knowledge needed to understand complex political issues. Just take care of our community affairs.That is the job of the Council.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for sharing your perspective. It appears there’s been a significant focus on foreign policy, with noticeable silence from the involved parties at present. This reticence may be influenced by the mayor’s stance, given her background and her apparent opposition to a ceasefire, leading others to align with her viewpoint. Considering the current challenges facing El Cerrito, it might be wise to prioritize local issues and steer clear of entanglement in foreign affairs.
LikeLike
This is a great perspective. Do you mind if we publish this? We would not publish your name unless you want us to publish it.
LikeLike
We will reach out.
LikeLike
Your comments are going thru.
LikeLike