Making Property Taxes Fair in El Cerrito: A Call for Balance and Affordability

El Cerrito is at a crossroads. As property taxes, sales tax, and now a proposed $300 parcel tax continue to rise, many homeowners feel squeezed by the financial burden of living here. The question is not just about funding vital services—it’s about ensuring that the people who already call El Cerrito home can afford to stay here. At the same time, we need to ensure that renters can eventually achieve their goal of homeownership if they choose to.

Breaking Down the Costs

El Cerrito homeowners already pay some of the highest taxes in the region. The 10.25% sales tax, combined with significant property tax assessments for schools, public services, and other obligations, creates a heavy financial load. Now, with a proposed $300 parcel tax on the table, it’s time to ask tough questions:

• Are we creating a system where longtime residents are priced out of the community they’ve built?

• Are we ensuring affordability for future homeowners so they, too, can call El Cerrito home?

We all benefit from El Cerrito’s schools, infrastructure, and public services. At the same time, we must ensure that rising taxes don’t make it impossible for families and individuals to stay here or invest in a home in the future.

Prioritizing Affordability and Inclusion

The rising cost of living in El Cerrito doesn’t just impact new homebuyers—it’s making it harder for current residents to stay. To ensure affordability and inclusion, the city should consider:

1. Transparent spending: Provide clear, detailed breakdowns of how tax dollars are spent, so residents can ensure their money is used efficiently and responsibly.

2. Long-term affordability: Balance the need for services with the long-term affordability of living in El Cerrito, ensuring that homeownership remains an achievable goal for renters and new families.

3. Community involvement: Engage residents in discussions about new measures and prioritize solutions that keep El Cerrito affordable for families, seniors, and longtime residents.

Let’s Protect Our Community

We’re not asking to avoid our responsibilities—we’re asking for fairness. Current homeowners shouldn’t be forced to leave El Cerrito because of rising taxes. Renters should have the opportunity to one day invest in their own homes. Let’s find solutions that ensure everyone can thrive, and that the city we love remains a place we can all afford to call home.

Contact the City and Speak Up

If you agree that affordability and fairness need to be priorities, reach out to El Cerrito’s City Clerk and City Council. Your voice matters.

• City Clerk: Holly M. Charléty, MMC

• Email: cityclerk@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Phone: 510-215-4305

• City Clerk’s Office

• Mayor Carolyn Wysinger

• Email: cwysinger@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Mayor Pro Tem Gabe Quinto

• Email: gquinto@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Councilmember Rebecca Saltzman

• Email: rsaltzman@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Councilmember Lisa Motoyama

• Email: lmotoyama@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Councilmember William Ktsanes

• Email: wktsanes@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Join the Conversation

Use your vote, voice, and platform to make a difference. Together, we can keep El Cerrito a place where everyone can live, thrive, and dream of homeownership.

#ElCerritoCommunity

#AffordableElCerrito

#FairTaxes

#InclusiveElCerrito

#StayInElCerrito

#TransparentSpending

Assessing Kensington’s Fair Share in Fire Services

When it comes to fire services, fairness and equity are essential to maintaining trust between neighboring communities. The El Cerrito-Kensington Fire Department, which provides critical fire protection and emergency medical services, serves both the city of El Cerrito and the smaller, affluent community of Kensington. However, questions have arisen about whether Kensington, with its population of 5,000 and its 1-square-mile area, is paying its fair share—and whether the department’s spending is truly efficient.

The Financial Breakdown

The fire department’s annual budget is approximately $15 million, of which Kensington reimburses about $4 million—roughly 27% of the total cost. With Kensington’s smaller population and size, one might wonder if this contribution is proportionate. Is this reimbursement reflective of the actual services Kensington consumes? Or is El Cerrito subsidizing Kensington’s fire protection at its own expense?

Staffing and Budget Concerns

A key point of concern lies in the department’s staffing structure, which includes four battalion chiefs—one specifically for training. While training is undoubtedly essential to maintaining a well-prepared fire department, many believe this responsibility could be effectively managed by a lower-level officer, saving significant costs.

Furthermore, questions arise about the necessity of the remaining three battalion chiefs. In an already stretched budget, can the department justify employing four high-ranking officers? How does this compare to other fire departments of similar size and scope? Nearby cities serving comparable populations often operate with fewer battalion chiefs, suggesting this staffing model may be excessive.

If Kensington’s reimbursement contributes to sustaining this structure, is it appropriate given the community’s size and needs? And is El Cerrito bearing the financial brunt of an overstaffed administrative tier?

Key Questions to Consider

How much of the fire department’s resources are consumed by Kensington? If Kensington receives a higher share of emergency responses or services relative to its population, its $4 million contribution might be insufficient. If service demand is lower, the contribution might be fair—or even generous.

Is the cost of four battalion chiefs justified? Could the training role be reassigned to a lower-ranking officer at a reduced cost? Are the other three battalion chiefs providing critical value to operations, or could their roles be streamlined to save on administrative expenses?

For a department with an already stretched budget, is it sustainable to maintain this staffing structure? Could reallocating funds from administrative roles to frontline services enhance efficiency and service quality?

If Kensington’s reimbursement helps sustain an inflated administrative structure, are El Cerrito residents unfairly subsidizing these costs? Should Kensington, as the wealthier community, contribute more, particularly if administrative expenses are inflated?

How do other departments of similar size and service areas allocate their budgets and manage administrative staffing? Comparative data could provide a clearer picture of what is reasonable and sustainable.

Why This Matters

Effective resource allocation is critical in maintaining public trust and ensuring high-quality fire services. If administrative costs, such as an unusually high number of battalion chiefs, are diverting funds from essential services, both El Cerrito and Kensington could be underserved.

Similarly, transparency and equity in cost-sharing arrangements are vital. If Kensington’s $4 million reimbursement does not adequately cover its share of service usage or disproportionately funds an inflated administrative structure, it may warrant renegotiation.

The Path Forward

It’s time to take a closer look at the fire department’s staffing model and budget allocation. Could the training responsibilities be managed by a lower-ranking officer? Are three additional battalion chiefs truly necessary? A comprehensive review of staffing needs and cost-sharing formulas could help identify areas for improvement, ensuring both communities receive equitable and efficient fire protection.

Residents and policymakers in El Cerrito and Kensington have an opportunity to collaborate, address these concerns, and establish a partnership that is both equitable and fiscally responsible.

Do you think four battalion chiefs are necessary for a department serving two small communities? Should Kensington contribute more to cover these costs? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

Community Feedback: Revisiting Remote Public Comments in El Cerrito

Feedback

We recently received a thoughtful comment from a concerned citizen regarding our previous blog post on the suspension of remote public comments in El Cerrito. The commenter rightly pointed out that the decision to halt remote participation was a direct response to coordinated “Zoom bombing” incidents, where non-residents disrupted meetings with antisemitic and white supremacist rhetoric. This context is crucial and was not adequately addressed in our initial post.

Understanding the Context

In September 2023, El Cerrito, along with other Bay Area cities like Berkeley, San Pablo, and Walnut Creek, faced significant disruptions during virtual public comment sessions. Organized groups exploited remote platforms to deliver hate speech, compelling these cities to suspend remote public comments to maintain the decorum and effectiveness of their meetings. 

The Current Landscape

While the immediate suspension was a necessary measure to address the disruptions, it’s important to assess the current state of public participation:

Duration of Suspension: Over a year has passed since the suspension of remote public comments in El Cerrito. During this time, the city has not revisited or updated its policy on virtual participation.

Impact on Accessibility: The absence of remote commenting options disproportionately affects residents with mobility challenges, caregiving responsibilities, or other constraints that prevent in-person attendance. Additionally, the discontinuation of recordings for advisory board and commission meetings further limits access to civic discussions for those unable to attend.

Looking Ahead

Given the evolving nature of virtual security measures and the successful reinstatement of remote comments in cities like Berkeley, it’s an opportune moment for El Cerrito to re-evaluate its stance. Implementing robust safeguards can mitigate the risk of disruptions while promoting inclusive civic engagement.

Engage with Your City Officials

We encourage residents to share their perspectives on this matter. By contacting the City Clerk and City Council members, you can advocate for policies that balance security with accessibility:

• City Clerk: cityclerk@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Mayor Carolyn Wysinger: cwysinger@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Mayor Pro Tem Gabe Quinto: gquinto@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Councilmember Lisa Motoyama: lmotoyama@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Councilmember William Ktsanes: wktsanes@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Councilmember Rebecca Saltzman: rsaltzman@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Conclusion

We appreciate the community’s engagement and feedback, which help us provide more accurate and comprehensive information. It’s essential to acknowledge past challenges while proactively seeking solutions that uphold both the integrity of public meetings and the inclusivity of civic participation.

#ElCerrito #PublicParticipation #CivicEngagement #InclusiveGovernance #CommunityFeedback

A Transparency Issue Beyond Just Numbers

Residents tuning into El Cerrito’s much-anticipated audit presentation were met with a frustrating and concerning reality: they simply couldn’t hear it. Those in attendance at the council chamber struggled to catch the details, while remote listeners missed most of the discussion entirely.

What makes this situation even more perplexing is that earlier commentary during the meeting was perfectly audible—both in person and remotely. Yet, when it came time for the financial audit presentation, the volume inexplicably dropped, raising questions about whether the city is truly committed to transparency and open communication.

Transparency Shouldn’t Be a Struggle

Public access to financial information is a fundamental aspect of responsible governance. If residents can’t hear the details of an audit presentation—one that’s crucial for understanding the city’s fiscal health—then transparency is effectively compromised. Ensuring accessibility should be a top priority, whether that means fixing technical issues or reconsidering how information is presented.

Shouldn’t Auditors Present In Person?

Another key concern raised by residents is the absence of the auditors in the council chamber. If the city selects and contracts with these auditors, shouldn’t they be expected to present their findings in person? Virtual presentations not only introduce potential communication barriers but also limit the opportunity for direct engagement and clarification. An in-person presentation allows for more effective dialogue, ensuring council members and the public can ask critical questions and receive immediate responses.

What Needs to Change?

1. Improved Audio Systems – The city must prioritize fixing any audio inconsistencies and ensuring that future presentations, especially those of such high importance, are clearly heard by all attendees, both in-person and remotely.

2. Mandate In-Person Auditor Presentations – When significant financial matters are on the agenda, auditors should be required to present in person to allow for a more transparent and interactive discussion.

3. Stronger Commitment to Transparency – The city council must ensure that financial discussions are not just performative but genuinely accessible to the public. If the city wants residents to stay informed, they must facilitate that process—not hinder it.

Take Action: Make Your Voice Heard

Residents who are concerned about these issues are encouraged to write to the El Cerrito City Clerk and request that their written communication be included in the City Council packet. This ensures that concerns about transparency and accessibility are formally documented and considered by council members.

Contact the City Clerk:

• City Clerk Holly M. Charléty

• Email: cityclerk@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Phone: (510) 215-4305

• Mailing Address:

• El Cerrito City Hall

• 10890 San Pablo Ave,

• El Cerrito, CA 94530

When writing to the City Clerk, be sure to copy the City Council to ensure your communication does not mysteriously disappear into thin air. Keeping council members informed directly increases accountability and ensures that your concerns are seen and addressed.

Copy the City Council at:

• Mayor Carolyn Wysinger – cwysinger@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Mayor Pro Tem Gabe Quinto – gquinto@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Councilmember Lisa Motoyama – lmotoyama@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Councilmember William Ktsanes – wktsanes@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Councilmember Rebecca Saltzman – rsaltzman@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

By speaking up and ensuring multiple points of contact, residents can help hold city leadership accountable and demand the transparency they deserve.

Stay tuned for more updates from the El Cerrito Committee for Responsible Government, where we’ll continue to monitor the city’s financial proceedings.

#ElCerrito #BudgetTransparency #CommunityEngagement #HoldThemAccountable #PublicFunds #CityCouncil #ECResponsibleGovernment #TransparencyMatters #FiscalResponsibility #DeficitWatch #Accountability

Updated 1/22/25 Reviving Remote Public Commentary in El Cerrito

The former mayor of El Cerrito, Tessa Rudnick, made the controversial decision to suspend remote public commentary during council meetings, citing concerns over antisemitic remarks. However, this reasoning serves as a red herring—masking the true impact of silencing community voices, particularly those who cannot attend in person.

Remote participation provided an essential platform for residents with dissenting opinions—opinions that city leadership has historically struggled to embrace. By removing this option, the council and city manager have effectively limited public discourse, making it harder for concerned citizens to hold them accountable.

El Cerrito thrives when all voices are heard, not just those who align with leadership. It’s time to bring back remote public commentary and ensure transparency, accessibility, and a government that truly serves its people.

📩 Take Action: Email the City Clerk and demand the return of remote public comment.

📧 City Clerk: cityclerk@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

📢 Contact City Council Members:

• Mayor Carolyn Wysinger: cwysinger@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Mayor Pro Tem Gabe Quinto: gquinto@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Councilmember Lisa Motoyama: lmotoyama@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Councilmember William Ktsanes: wktsanes@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Councilmember Rebecca Saltzman: rsaltzman@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Use Your Voice! Let them know that accessibility and accountability matter.

#ElCerrito #TransparencyMatters #LetUsSpeak #CivicEngagement #PublicComment #LocalGovernment #CommunityVoice #OpenGovernment #AccessibilityForAll #HoldThemAccountable

El Cerrito Financial Audit: Transparency Concerns

As the community eagerly awaits the results of El Cerrito’s financial audit, concerns about transparency and clarity in the city’s financial reporting continue to mount. A concerned citizen recently highlighted critical questions that remain unanswered ahead of Tuesday’s city council meeting.

Key Financial Terms Still Unclear

Despite repeated calls for greater transparency, essential financial terms such as “Reserves,” “General Fund Reserves,” “Unrestricted General Fund Reserves,” “Rollover Expenditures,” and “Unassigned” remain ambiguous to the public. Understanding these terms is crucial for residents to grasp the city’s financial health, yet the absence of clear definitions hinders meaningful engagement.

What is the Unrestricted Reserve Balance?

One of the most critical unanswered questions is the current balance of the city’s Unrestricted General Fund Reserves. Residents deserve to know how much is available for immediate needs and whether the city is maintaining an adequate financial cushion. Without this information, it is impossible to assess the true state of El Cerrito’s fiscal health.

Mid-Year Adjustment Discrepancies

Another pressing concern is the significant discrepancy in the mid-year budget adjustment made in March. The final fourth-quarter report indicates expenditures exceeded revenues—essentially a deficit. However, city management has been hesitant to acknowledge or use the term “deficit” outright, leaving residents questioning the accuracy and accountability of financial reporting.

Delayed Audit Report and Accountability

Residents were previously informed that the audit report would be available by December, yet it remains absent from the public record. With the audit now scheduled for discussion at the upcoming meeting, the lack of transparency about the delay raises further doubts about the city’s commitment to accountability.

Call for Clear Communication

The concerned citizen also underscored the need for city officials to speak clearly and directly during public meetings so residence were tuning in online can hear clearly.

Residents are urging council members to demand plain-language explanations so the broader community can understand the city’s financial position without jargon or obfuscation.

Next Steps for Concerned Residents

As Tuesday’s meeting approaches, residents are encouraged to participate actively, asking tough questions and holding city leadership accountable for providing honest and transparent financial disclosures. The hope is that increased public scrutiny will push the city toward more responsible financial management practices.

Contact El Cerrito City Council

Residents who want to voice their concerns can contact the City Council at:

Stay informed by following updates on the El Cerrito Committee for Responsible Government, where we will continue to monitor and report on developments related to the city’s financial oversight.

#ElCerrito #ElCerritoBudget #TransparencyMatters #FiscalResponsibility #CommunityEngagement #HoldThemAccountable #DeficitWatch #PublicFunds #CityCouncil #BudgetTransparency #ECResponsibleGovernment

Microblog: Concerns Over Community Engagement in El Cerrito’s Richmond Street Planning

A concerned resident shared frustrations about a November workshop that left attendees feeling unheard. The meeting format, which featured a presentation and stations around the room, seemed to lack opportunities for meaningful dialogue or the presentation of alternative viewpoints.

“We’re invited to these meetings, but I don’t think they’re set up in a way that there’s any dialogue,” the resident said, reflecting a broader sentiment about the need for more transparent and inclusive community discussions.

Adding to the concern is the $790,219 contract for the Del Norte project, which may explain why the proposed bike path only stretches from Moeser Lane northward. Residents are questioning the reasoning behind this limited scope, especially in light of the city’s numerous contracts and long-term planning goals.

For further details, the official project document can be accessed here.

El Cerrito’s Financial Transparency Under Scrutiny

On Tuesday, January 21, 2025, the City of El Cerrito will receive a presentation on its Fiscal Year 2023-24 financial statements, prepared by Sheldon Chavan of Chavan & Associates LLP. While this presentation should provide critical insights into the city’s financial health, there are glaring concerns about transparency and objectivity in how the information will be presented to the public.

A Familiar Pattern: Favorable Narratives from Familiar Contractors

El Cerrito has a long-standing practice of relying on contractors who align with the city manager’s perspective, often favoring those willing to frame their findings in ways that cast the city in a positive light. This tendency has contributed to a lack of accountability and a lack of honesty. One consequence is the city’s reluctance to rotate service providers, which could bring fresh perspectives and more objective analysis to its operations.

Auditors and other consultants who consistently align with city leadership are often retained year after year, creating a relationship that risks eroding impartiality. The resulting presentations may gloss over critical issues or emphasize selective data to support the city’s narrative. This approach does little to instill public confidence in the integrity of the financial review process.

No Document for Public Review

While the auditor’s presentation is scheduled for Tuesday’s City Council meeting, the audit documents themselves are not currently available on the city’s financial transparency page. This raises significant concerns:

  • How can residents critically assess the presentation without access to the underlying documents?
  • Why hasn’t the city made these materials available in advance to encourage informed public participation?

Without the ability to review these documents, the public is effectively sidelined in discussions about the city’s financial position. Transparency is not just about holding meetings; it’s about equipping the community with the tools they need to engage meaningfully.

Questions the City Must Answer

  1. When will the audit documents be posted?
  2. Where will they be made available for public review?
  3. What steps will the city take to ensure future financial materials are accessible before key discussions?

Addressing these questions is essential to restoring trust and demonstrating that the city is committed to more than just optics when it comes to its financial accountability.

Upcoming City Council Meeting: A Chance to Demand Transparency

Residents concerned about El Cerrito’s financial transparency are encouraged to attend the upcoming City Council meeting:

Meeting Details:

  • Date and Time: Tuesday, January 21, 2025, at 5:00 PM and 6:00 PM
  • Location: City Council Chambers, 10890 San Pablo Ave., El Cerrito, CA 94530
  • Remote Access: Closed captions and online streaming are available via Zoom.
  • Agenda Packet: El Cerrito City Council Agenda Packet

Speak Up and Get Involved

While the city’s leadership often crafts favorable narratives, public engagement remains a powerful tool for accountability.

Attendees can ask questions, request clarity on missing information, and demand that financial presentations reflect the full reality of the city’s fiscal health—not just the polished version.

For those unable to attend, input can still be shared directly with councilmembers:

Conclusion: Transparency Over Optics

El Cerrito’s FY 2023-24 financial statements should be an opportunity for honest reflection on the city’s fiscal policies and practices. However, the absence of the audit documents and the city’s track record of working with agreeable contractors suggest otherwise.

By providing timely access to financial documents, rotating service providers to encourage objectivity, and fostering genuine public engagement, El Cerrito can begin to shift away from its reputation for controlling narratives and build a foundation of true accountability. The community deserves nothing less.

El Cerrito’s Push for Cannabis Revenue: A Sustainable Strategy or a Red Flag?

In the upcoming El Cerrito City Council meeting, the focus turned to expanding cannabis opportunities as a revenue source. This comes on the heels of the establishment of two major dispensaries, NUG (opened in 2021) and STIIIZY (opened in 2023), which contribute community benefits fees and fund initiatives for local projects. While cannabis operations promise economic boosts, it’s essential to examine their broader impact, especially when comparing El Cerrito to its neighboring cities.

The Numbers: Cannabis, Massage Parlors, Liquor Stores, Restaurants, and Coffee Shops Per Capita

A deeper dive into business concentration highlights disparities between El Cerrito and its neighboring cities. Below is a breakdown of cannabis dispensaries, massage parlors, liquor stores, restaurants, and coffee shops:

El Cerrito:

• Cannabis Dispensaries: 2 (1 per 12,500 residents)

• Massage Parlors: 5 (1 per 5,000 residents)

• Liquor Stores: 12 (1 per 2,083 residents)

• Restaurants: 54 (1 per 463 residents)

• Coffee Shops: 5 (1 per 5,000 residents)

Albany:

• Cannabis Dispensaries: 0

• Massage Parlors: 2 (1 per 10,000 residents)

• Liquor Stores: 7 (1 per 2,857 residents)

• Restaurants: 78 (1 per 256 residents)

• Coffee Shops: 3 (1 per 6,666 residents)

Hercules:

• Cannabis Dispensaries: 0

• Massage Parlors: 1 (1 per 26,000 residents)

• Liquor Stores: 6 (1 per 4,333 residents)

• Restaurants: 38 (1 per 684 residents)

• Coffee Shops: 3 (1 per 8,666 residents)

What Does This Say About Financial Stability?

El Cerrito stands out for its higher concentration of cannabis dispensaries, massage parlors, and liquor stores compared to Albany and Hercules. These establishments often indicate short-term revenue strategies rather than the long-term stability seen in cities with diverse economic bases. Albany, for example, boasts nearly 50% more restaurants per capita and fewer liquor stores and massage parlors, reflecting a focus on community-oriented development.

Hercules takes a different approach with strict zoning, resulting in fewer liquor stores and massage parlors per capita. Its policies prioritize residential and family-friendly developments, showcasing a model for controlled growth.

Upcoming City Council Meeting: Attend and Get Involved

The next El Cerrito City Council meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, January 21, 2025, at 7:00 PM. Interested parties are encouraged to attend to learn more and participate in discussions about the city’s cannabis policies and related initiatives.

Meeting Details:

Location: City Council Chambers, 10890 San Pablo Ave., El Cerrito, CA 94530

Agenda Packet: El Cerrito City Council Agenda Packet

Remote Access: Closed captions and online streaming are available via Zoom.

Contact Your City Council Members

If you have questions or would like to share your input before the meeting, you can reach out to the current El Cerrito City Council members directly:

• Mayor Carolyn Wysinger: cwysinger@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Mayor Pro Tem Gabe Quinto: gquinto@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Councilmember William Ktsanes: wktsanes@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Councilmember Lisa Motoyama: lmotoyama@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

• Councilmember Rebecca Saltzman: rsaltzman@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

A Balanced Path Forward

While cannabis businesses offer immediate revenue opportunities, El Cerrito should prioritize fostering a balance by encouraging more restaurants and coffee shops. These businesses drive long-term stability, create jobs, and enhance the quality of life. Lessons from Albany and Hercules demonstrate the value of strategic zoning and a focus on diverse, community-focused economic growth.

Conclusion: Investing in Community and Sustainability

El Cerrito has the opportunity to adjust its economic approach by reducing reliance on cannabis, liquor stores, and massage parlors while increasing investments in restaurants, coffee shops, and family-friendly amenities. By doing so, the city can foster a thriving and sustainable community that serves both economic and social interests.

For more information about the El Cerrito City Council and upcoming meetings, visit the official website: El Cerrito City Council.

If you have any further questions or comments, drop us a comment

El Cerrito’s Waste Management Costs: Need for Competitive Bidding

The City of El Cerrito has maintained a longstanding partnership with East Bay Sanitary Company for waste management services since 1941. While this enduring relationship has provided stability, the absence of competitive bidding in contract renewals raises concerns about cost efficiency and service quality.

Rising Costs for Residents

Over the years, residents have experienced consistent increases in garbage collection rates. The table below illustrates the escalation in monthly rates for a standard 35-gallon cart:

YearCollection FeePost-Collection FeeIntegrated Waste Management (IWM) FeeTotal Monthly Rate
2023$31.80$10.68$22.85$65.33
2024$32.91$11.15$23.86$67.92
2025$36.12$11.15$23.86$71.13

These figures demonstrate a significant upward trend in costs over the years.

The Case for Competitive Bidding

Introducing a competitive bidding process for waste management services can offer several benefits:

  • Cost Efficiency: Studies have shown that municipalities engaging in competitive tendering for waste services can achieve substantial cost savings. For instance, research indicates that cities utilizing contracted operations for waste services have significantly lower average costs per household compared to those that do not.
  • Enhanced Service Quality: Competition encourages providers to innovate and improve their offerings to secure contracts, leading to better service quality for residents.
  • Transparency and Accountability: A transparent bidding process ensures that contracts are awarded based on merit and value, fostering public trust in municipal governance.

In California, procurement laws emphasize competitive bidding to ensure fairness, transparency, and the prudent use of public funds. However, there are specific circumstances where non-competitive procurement methods, such as sole source or single source awards, are permissible:

Sole Source Procurement: Occurs when only one supplier possesses the unique capability to meet the requirements, often due to proprietary technology, specialized expertise, or exclusive rights. Cal Poly

Contact Your City Officials

To advocate for a competitive bidding process in El Cerrito’s waste management services, residents are encouraged to contact their City Council members and the City Clerk. Expressing your concerns and suggestions can influence the city’s decision-making process.

City Council Members:

  • Carolyn Wysinger, Mayor (Term Ends: 2026)
    • Email: cwysinger@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us
  • Gabe Quinto, Councilmember (Term Ends: 2026)
    • Email: gquinto@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us
  • Lisa Motoyama, Council Member (Term Ends: 2028)
    • Email: lmotoyama@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us
  • Rebecca Saltzman, Council Member (Term Ends: 2028)
    • Email: rsaltzman@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us
  • William Ktsanes, Council Member (Term Ends: 2028)
    • Email: wktsanes@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

City Clerk:

  • Holly M. Charléty, MMC, City Clerk
    • Email: cityclerk@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us
    • Phone: 510-215-4305

How to Submit Your Comments:

  1. Email the City Clerk: Send your written comments to cityclerk@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us. Request that your comments be included in the City Council meeting packet.

El Cerrito

  1. Attend City Council Meetings: Participate in upcoming meetings to voice your concerns during the public comment period. Meeting schedules and agendas are available on the city’s official website.

El Cerrito

Engaging in the civic process by communicating with your elected officials is a powerful way to advocate for change. By urging the City Council to initiate a competitive bidding process for waste management services, residents can help ensure that El Cerrito receives the best value and quality in its service contracts.

For more information on the benefits of competitive bidding in municipal waste services, refer to the study “Picking Up Savings: The Benefits of Competition in Municipal Waste Services.”

El Cerrito Responsible Government

2025 El Cerrito Budget Priorities: No Meeting Scheduled

The last Priority Setting and Budget Kickoff for El Cerrito took place on January 13, 2024. Facilitated by consultants at a significant cost, the meeting was billed as an opportunity to shape the city’s goals and budget priorities. However, it left many community members disappointed. Concerns about insufficient advertising, minimal participation from city staff, and the overall lack of meaningful engagement dominated the feedback.

Community members expressed frustration over how the meeting was conducted. The limited outreach meant many residents were unaware of the event, and those who attended felt the absence of city staff hindered an open and productive dialogue. Despite the use of consultants, many left feeling that the process was more performative than substantive.

No Kickoff Meeting in Sight for 2025

As of now, no Priority Setting or Budget Kickoff has been scheduled for 2025. This lack of planning raises serious questions about how the city plans to prioritize its goals and involve residents in shaping the budget for the coming year. After the challenges of the 2024 meeting, residents expected improvements. Instead, the absence of this important process suggests that the city may be moving further away from transparency and inclusivity.

A Pattern of Controlled Agendas

Based on past experience, whenever the city hosts a “workshop” or meeting, the agenda is often set to align with the city’s position, leaving little room for meaningful discussion or input that challenges their narrative. These meetings are carefully structured to create the appearance of community involvement, but the reality is often quite different. True town halls—where there is open dialogue and genuine give-and-take between councilmembers, city staff, and residents—are virtually nonexistent. Instead, the city tends to limit input to feedback that supports their agenda, leaving many feeling excluded from the decision-making process.

Why This Matters

A Priority Setting and Budget Kickoff is more than just a formality; it’s an opportunity for city leadership to engage openly with residents, share their vision, and demonstrate their commitment to collaboration. Without such a meeting, residents lose a vital avenue to voice their concerns, ask tough questions, and advocate for their priorities. This creates a widening gap between leadership and the community they serve.

What Comes Next?

While the absence of a scheduled meeting is disappointing, it is not too late for the city to change course. Residents can and should demand better—more transparency, more inclusivity, and a more authentic approach to engagement. A true town hall setting, where open dialogue is encouraged and dissenting voices are welcomed, is critical to rebuilding trust and ensuring that decisions reflect the community’s needs.

The city’s leadership must recognize that community involvement isn’t just a box to check—it’s the foundation of good governance. Let’s hope that 2025 brings a renewed commitment to fostering genuine dialogue and collaboration between residents, city staff, and councilmembers.

El Cerrito deserves nothing less.

How El Cerrito Could Save Millions on Pension Payments

On March 2, 2021, NHA Advisors, one of the City of El Cerrito’s financial consultants, presented a critical financial update to the city council. The presentation highlighted the City’s projected $70.3 million Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) as of June 30, 2021. During this session, NHA pointed out that other cities had successfully issued pension obligation bonds at favorable interest rates, ranging from 2.54% to 3.75%.

Despite this information, El Cerrito failed to act.

A Missed Opportunity

Had the city issued $70.3 million in pension obligation bonds at 4% interest over 30 years, taxpayers would have faced annual payments of approximately $4 million. This figure is substantially lower than the payments El Cerrito now faces. This year, for example, the city celebrated a prepayment of $7 million, and by next July, the payment is expected to increase to nearly $8 million.

This raises an important question: Was Measure G tax money needed to make up for the extra financial burden resulting from this inaction? Some believe that annual CalPERS payments may continue to rise.

Here’s a simplified breakdown:

  • Principal: $70,300,000
  • Interest Rate: 4.00%
  • Loan Term: 30 years
  • Annual Payment: ~$4,065,456

Tools like Microsoft Excel can confirm this calculation.

Interest Rates Dropped Even Lower

What makes this missed opportunity even more glaring is that interest rates eventually dropped further. According to NHA Advisors:

“Spreads to taxable Treasury rates have lowered significantly in recent months, resulting in 2.54% to 2.85% interest rates for the four most recent transactions.”

If El Cerrito had acted, the city might have saved approximately $2.7 million annually—funds that could have been used to support essential services, infrastructure, or other taxpayer priorities.

For context, you can view NHA’s detailed presentation here and the meeting recording here.

A Call for Action in 2021

A concerned resident wrote to the city council on March 27, 2021, calling for greater scrutiny of El Cerrito’s financial situation:

“It has been over 800 days since the first ‘going concern’ statement. It is time for the council to take action. What will happen when the CalPERS discount rate is lowered? Should the city consider issuing revenue bonds based on the transfer tax? Have you looked closely at the yield curve and the spread over Treasuries?

If management does not have the expertise to solve this multi-million dollar issue, the council should look to the city’s most financially savvy residents or bring in additional expertise. This deserves far more attention.”

The letter urged the council to consider:

  1. Issuing revenue bonds tied to the city’s transfer tax.
  2. Exploring ways to stabilize the city’s bond rating, currently at BBB+.
  3. Considering financial strategies that address CalPERS obligations before rates rise further.

At a time when cities across California are grappling with pension liabilities, El Cerrito had an opportunity to reduce its financial burden significantly. The cost of inaction is clear, and as CalPERS rates potentially increase, this issue will only become more urgent.

Now, more than ever, residents deserve transparency and proactive solutions from their city leaders. Financial challenges like these require expertise, initiative, and a commitment to fiscal responsibility.

For those interested in understanding the details, the NHA presentation remains an essential resource.

The conversation about pension liabilities is far from over. El Cerrito’s future depends on leadership willing to explore bold, practical solutions.

Why El Cerrito’s Taxpayer Value is in Question

As the new year begins, residents of El Cerrito may notice a stark contrast between their city’s operations and those of neighboring municipalities. While cities like San Pablo, Richmond, Albany, and Hercules are conducting city council meetings during the first full week of January, El Cerrito’s City Hall remains closed, with staff on a two-week holiday break from December 20, 2024, through January 3, 2025.

El Cerrito

This extended closure has tangible implications for the community. With city staff unavailable, essential tasks such as preparing and publishing meeting agendas cannot be completed in accordance with the Brown Act’s 48-hour public notice requirement. Consequently, the City Council meeting meeting for January 7th is cancelled and other public engagements are delayed, hindering civic participation and the timely addressing of community concerns.

What exacerbates this situation is the city’s staffing and compensation structure. The El Cerrito City Manager is paid comparably to those of larger cities. Paid more than her peers in cities of similar size, she manages to deliver significantly less with substantially more resources. El Cerrito employs a significantly larger staff compared to similar-sized neighboring cities. For instance, in 2020, El Cerrito had 384 city employees, with 159 full-time positions, serving a population of approximately 25,000. In contrast, San Pablo, with a larger population of nearly 31,000, operated with 252 employees, including 114 full-time staff. This disparity results in a higher cost per resident in El Cerrito, amounting to $1,163, compared to San Pablo’s $704 per resident.

El Cerrito Responsible Government

Despite this larger workforce and higher expenditure, the recent holiday closure suggests that residents may not be receiving commensurate value for their tax dollars. The complete shutdown of city services for two weeks, a practice not commonly observed in neighboring municipalities, raises questions about operational efficiency and resource allocation.

Moreover, concerns have been raised about the city’s payroll expenses. Reports indicate that El Cerrito’s staff size and compensation contribute significantly to its financial obligations, including a substantial unfunded pension liability.

El Cerrito Responsible Government

In light of these issues, it is imperative for El Cerrito’s leadership to reassess the city’s staffing models, compensation structures, and operational practices. Implementing more efficient management strategies could ensure that residents receive better value for their tax contributions and that city services remain uninterrupted, even during holiday periods.

As taxpayers, residents have a vested interest in advocating for transparency, accountability, and fiscal responsibility within their local government. Engaging in public discussions, attending city council meetings (once they resume), and voicing concerns can drive the necessary changes to enhance the quality and reliability of city services in El Cerrito.

As of December 2024, the following individuals represent the community on the City Council:

Reach out to your representatives to share concerns and ideas. Engaging with our elected officials is key to driving positive change. Let’s work together to ensure our government reflects the values and priorities of the community!

#TransparencyMatters
#AccountabilityNow
#EfficientGovernment
#WhereAreOurTaxes
#FixOurServices
#CitizensForChange
#EfficientSpending

El Cerrito Budget: Rising Costs, Fewer Services

Over the past decade, El Cerrito’s city budget has grown from $54.8 million in FY 2015-16 to $65.3 million in FY 2024-25—an increase of $10.5 million, or 19.1%. Despite this significant rise, residents have seen fewer services instead of the expanded programs or enhanced infrastructure one might expect from such a budgetary increase. The closure of the senior center and reduced library hours are just a few examples of the city’s retreat from providing essential services.

This troubling trend of higher budgets paired with diminished services raises serious concerns about how the city manages taxpayer dollars.

A Decade of Rising Budgets

Here’s the year-by-year progression of El Cerrito’s budget:

  • FY 2015-16: $54.8 million
  • FY 2016-17: $56.3 million (+2.7%)
  • FY 2017-18: $57.1 million (+1.4%)
  • FY 2018-19: $58.2 million (+1.9%)
  • FY 2019-20: $59.7 million (+2.6%)
  • FY 2020-21: $60.4 million (+1.2%)
  • FY 2021-22: $61.2 million (+1.3%)
  • FY 2022-23: $63.8 million (+4.3%)
  • FY 2023-24: $64.1 million (+0.5%)
  • FY 2024-25: $65.3 million (+1.9%)

While a steadily increasing budget often suggests expanded services, El Cerrito’s residents have instead experienced cutbacks that directly impact their quality of life.

Reduced Services for Residents

Despite the 19.1% increase in spending, El Cerrito has scaled back essential services, leaving residents with less for their money. Some of the most notable reductions include:

  • Library Hours: Operating hours have been reduced, limiting access to an essential educational and community resource.
  • Senior Center: Once a vibrant hub for seniors, the senior center has been completely closed, leaving older residents without critical support.
  • Parks and Recreation: Reduced maintenance schedules have left parks and recreation areas in decline.
  • Community Programs: Many recreational and cultural programs have been eliminated or drastically scaled back.

These reductions are a far cry from the improvements residents should expect when the city’s budget grows by over $10 million in a decade.

Deficit Spending and the Real Property Transfer Tax

To address its deficits, the city implemented a real property transfer tax on property sales. Initially, this tax provided a much-needed revenue stream, but it is no longer growing as anticipated due to a cooling real estate market.

El Cerrito cannot continue this trajectory of rising costs and shrinking services. Residents deserve financial transparency and responsible spending from their city leadership. Here’s what needs to happen:

With this revenue plateauing, the city is facing a harsh financial reality: without significant changes, the only way to sustain its current spending levels would be to raise taxes again. This is a concerning prospect for residents who already face some of the highest sales and property taxes in the region.

  1. Conduct a Comprehensive Audit: The city must thoroughly review its expenditures to identify inefficiencies and eliminate waste.
  2. Restore Essential Services: Priority must be given to reopening the senior center, restoring library hours, and maintaining parks and recreational spaces.
  3. Commit to No New Taxes: Residents already pay some of the highest taxes in the region. The city must live within its means rather than passing the burden onto taxpayers.

Contact Your Council Members

El Cerrito’s residents must demand better financial management and accountability from their elected officials. Contact your City Council members today and urge them to:

  • Make the necessary cuts to ensure sustainable spending.
  • Prioritize the restoration of essential services.
  • Oppose any proposals for new taxes.

Additionally, you can contact the City Clerk to have your commentary included in the City Council packets. This ensures your concerns are officially documented and considered during council meetings.

You can reach the City Clerk, Holly M. Charléty, at cityclerk@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us.

El Cerrito

Your voice matters. Together, we can push for the responsible fiscal policies El Cerrito needs to restore its services without adding to the tax burden on its residents.

The Bottom Line

El Cerrito’s budget has grown by nearly 20% over the past decade, but instead of delivering more, the city has delivered less. The closure of the senior center, reduced library hours, and scaled-back community programs are unacceptable in the face of a rising budget.

Residents deserve better. Let’s hold our city leaders accountable and demand a sustainable, service-focused future for El Cerrito—without new taxes.

The message is clear: No new taxes. Restore our services. Practice fiscal responsibility. Contact your council members and the City Clerk today and make your voice heard.

City Services vs. Staffing: A Call for Efficiency

The city faces an undeniable challenge: its staffing levels and payroll far exceed what is necessary to deliver essential services. Basic responsibilities like street maintenance, park upkeep, and permitting are falling short, while the workforce and associated costs continue to grow unchecked. Adding to the frustration, public information requests are often delayed or denied, leaving residents wondering how their tax dollars are spent.

Services That Don’t Match the Price Tag

Core city services like maintaining streets, sidewalks, parks, and processing permits are falling below expectations. Roads need repair, parks aren’t maintained to the standards residents expect, and the permitting process often feels unnecessarily complicated. Meanwhile, other cities provide comparable or superior services with much lower staffing levels and significantly lower payroll and pension cost.

Staffing Comparison: How We Measure Up to Nearby Cities

The city employs significantly more staff per capita than neighboring cities. Here’s how staffing levels compare:

  • Our City:
    • Population: Approximately 25,000
    • Total Employees: 384
    • Employees per 1,000 Residents: 15.36
  • San Pablo:
    • Population: Approximately 31,000
    • Total Employees: 252
    • Employees per 1,000 Residents: 8.13
  • Albany:
    • Population: Approximately 20,000
    • Total Employees: 208
    • Employees per 1,000 Residents: 10.4
  • Hercules:
    • Population: Approximately 25,000
    • Total Employees: 192
    • Employees per 1,000 Residents: 7.68

These figures highlight a clear disparity. Staffing levels here are nearly double those of nearby cities, raising questions about operational efficiency and priorities.

Public Information Concerns

Transparency is another key issue. Residents requesting public records often face delays, incomplete information, or outright denials. Accessing budget data, policy details, or financial reports feels unnecessarily difficult. Why aren’t taxpayers given clear answers about how their money is being used?

Time for Change

Addressing these challenges requires bold action. Here are some steps city leaders should consider:

  1. Conduct an Efficiency Audit: Assess staffing levels and operational costs to identify redundancies.
  2. Focus on Core Services: Prioritize visible, tangible improvements like road repairs, park maintenance, and smoother permitting processes.
  3. Ensure Transparency: Make public records and financial reports easily accessible.
  4. Engage Residents: Include community members in discussions about budget priorities and service improvements.
  5. Rethink Financial Practices: Focus on sustainable strategies rather than relying on repeated tax increases.

If you’d like to share your comments with the City Council to be included in their council packet, contact the City Clerk at cityclerk@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us.

Let’s start the conversation—what changes would you like to see? Share your thoughts below!

Meet Your City Council Members

As of December 2024, the following individuals represent the community on the City Council:

Reach out to your representatives to share concerns and ideas. Engaging with our elected officials is key to driving positive change. Let’s work together to ensure our government reflects the values and priorities of the community!

#TransparencyMatters
#AccountabilityNow
#EfficientGovernment
#WhereAreOurTaxes
#FixOurServices
#CitizensForChange
#EfficientSpending

Why El Cerrito’s High-Risk Removal Doesn’t Mean Financial Stability

The City of El Cerrito has recently announced its removal from the California State Auditor’s High-Risk Local Government Agency Audit Program. While this may sound like a victory, it’s important to understand what this actually means. The “high risk” designation applies to only the worst 3% of cities in California. Being removed from this list doesn’t signify true financial stability—it simply means the city is no longer among the absolute worst financial performers.

Persistent Financial Challenges

El Cerrito’s removal from the high-risk list doesn’t erase its ongoing financial issues. Here are some of the most pressing concerns:

Unfunded Liabilities:

The city still carries significant unfunded pension and retiree health liabilities, which pose a serious risk to its financial future. The amount of $89 million owed to Cal Pers exceeds the entire operating budget amount.

2. Non-Disclosure of Unrestricted Reserves:

Transparency is still lacking. The city has yet to disclose the state of its unrestricted reserves, leaving residents in the dark about the true financial health of their community.

3. High Payroll Costs with Flat Revenue:

El Cerrito continues to have the highest payroll per capita in Contra Costa County. For a city of its size, this level of expenditure is unsustainable and diverts funds from other critical needs. Worse yet, with flat revenue, the high payroll cost will continue to drain on unrestricted reserves, leaving the city vulnerable to future financial crises.

Don’t Be Misled

Residents should not be misled by the city’s announcement. Removal from the high-risk list is not a declaration of financial health—it simply means El Cerrito is no longer at the absolute bottom. The city’s financial stability is still precarious, and critical issues like unfunded liabilities, excessive payroll costs, and the lack of reserve transparency remain unresolved and over 400 cities in California are more financially stable.

Call to Action: Demand Accountability

Residents must take action to ensure their voices are heard. It’s vital to hold the City Council accountable for addressing these persistent financial issues and for improving transparency in fiscal management.

We urge citizens to contact the City Council and City Clerk to express their concerns. Specifically, request that your letters or emails be included as part of the public record in the meeting packet. This ensures that your concerns are not just heard but are formally documented.

How to Take Action

1. Write a letter or email to the City Council expressing your concerns about the city’s financial management and lack of transparency.

2. Request that your correspondence be included in the meeting packet for the next City Council session.

3. Follow up by attending council meetings or reviewing the meeting materials to ensure your voice is represented.

Conclusion

El Cerrito’s announcement may seem like progress, but the truth is far less reassuring. Don’t be misled. While being removed from the high-risk list is a step forward, the city’s finances remain unstable and need serious reform. El Cerrito risks falling into fiscal disarray without addressing issues like unfunded liabilities, lack of unrestricted reserves, and unsustainable payroll costs. Residents must stay vigilant and demand greater transparency and accountability from their local government to secure a sustainable future.

ElCerrito

CityCouncilAccountability

FiscalTransparency

CommunityAction

FinancialStability

HoldLeadershipAccountable

LocalGovernmentMatters

CitizenEngagement

UnfundedLiabilities

TransparencyMatters

FlatRevenueConcerns

PublicReserves

SustainableBudgeting

PayrollCosts

CommunityVoices

El Cerrito: The Case for Ethical Governance

Good governance is not just about following the rules—it’s about doing what’s right for the people you serve. In El Cerrito, recent actions by city leaders highlight a troubling pattern: decisions that may be technically permissible but lack a moral compass and integrity. These choices raise critical questions about whether city leaders put the community first or prioritize their convenience and control.

Federal Funds Misused: A Missed Opportunity for the Community

The federal government provided ARPA bailout funds to help communities address the challenges brought on by the pandemic. These funds were intended to support residents by improving services, aiding small businesses, or investing in much-needed infrastructure. Yet in El Cerrito, these funds were diverted to balance the city’s need for overdraft protection,

While this may have been allowed by a loophole in the rules, it wasn’t the right thing to do. Balancing the budget is important, but using federal funds as a Band-Aid instead of addressing the city’s structural financial problems fails to solve the root issues. Worse, it betrays the trust of residents who expected those funds to directly benefit the community.

Silencing Voices: Misusing the Morning Rule

The City Council’s recent use of the “morning rule” is another example of leaders acting within their legal authority but outside the bounds of ethical governance. The rule allows the Council to cut off public comments after midnight. However, the way it was applied at a recent meeting has sparked outrage.

Reports suggest city officials anticipated the arrival of a group of concerned citizens and preemptively planned to silence them. By issuing three quick warnings and calling the police to escort them out, the Council weaponized this procedural rule to avoid hearing dissent. This deliberate move to suppress public voices erodes trust and undermines the democratic process.

Integrity in Leadership: More Than Just Following Rules

These incidents reflect a larger issue: a failure of moral leadership. Just because something is allowed doesn’t mean it should be done. True leadership requires asking hard questions:

  • Is this decision in the best interest of the community?
  • Are we prioritizing the needs of the people over political expediency?
  • Are we fostering an open, inclusive dialogue where all voices can be heard?

Leadership demands transparency, accountability, and a commitment to ethical decision-making—even when it’s inconvenient. When leaders cut corners or suppress dissent, they harm the very people they are meant to serve.

El Cerrito deserves better. It’s time for residents to demand more from their city leaders. Moral competence, integrity, and a commitment to the public good must be the foundation of every decision made. Leaders should be held to a higher standard—not just following the rules, but living up to the values of fairness, equity, and service.

As residents, we must stay engaged, hold our leaders accountable, and push for governance that prioritizes the community’s needs. Together, we can build a stronger, more trustworthy El Cerrito—one where decisions are made not because they are easy, but because they are right.

#ElCerrito #IntegrityInLeadership #MoralCompetence #CommunityFirst #TransparencyMatters #AccountabilityNow #EthicalLeadership #GoodGovernance #CivicEngagement #ElCerritoDeservesBetter

Moving Beyond Temporary Fixes: El Cerrito’s Path to Stability

El Cerrito’s financial journey over the past two decades highlights a persistent pattern of fiscal instability and difficult decision-making. While the city recently managed to remove itself from the State Auditor’s High-Risk Cities List, over 450 cities in California are still more well-run, underscoring the ongoing challenges the city faces.

From Stability to Decline: The Early 2000s

In 2001, El Cerrito was in a strong financial position with general fund reserves at 42% of annual expenditures. The city’s general fund budget was around $28 million—comparatively modest but well-managed. Today, the general fund budget has ballooned to $52 million, yet the financial outlook has only worsened. The once-promising financial foundation has eroded, leaving the city grappling with deficits and unmet infrastructure needs.

Temporary Gains, Structural Issues

In recent years, El Cerrito has relied on increased tax collections, federal ARPA funds, and postponement of major capital improvement projects to stabilize its finances. Measures like closing the senior center, while effective in reducing short-term costs, failed to address the deeper structural issues plaguing the city. These temporary fixes provided breathing room but left critical infrastructure, like the city’s roads, in steady decline.

The Persistent Problem of Deficit Spending

By FY 2024, El Cerrito had returned to deficit spending, reflecting an inability to balance its budget while addressing deferred projects. While no longer in the bottom 3% of cities statewide, over 450 other cities in California are still better run. This speaks volumes about El Cerrito’s ongoing inability to resolve its fundamental fiscal issues. More deficit spending is expected in the coming years, raising concerns about the city’s ability to sustain basic services and improve the quality of life for its residents.

Leadership and Accountability: A Double-Edged Sword

Contrary to fostering stability, El Cerrito’s leadership has often perpetuated a downward trend. Many key figures in city governance have remained in their roles for years, but continuity in leadership has not translated into effective financial management. Instead, it has contributed to entrenched strategies that have failed to address the city’s systemic issues. Residents are left questioning whether a change in leadership and approach might finally reverse the city’s trajectory.

Getting Off the State Auditor’s List: A Hollow Victory?

While getting off the State Auditor’s High-Risk Cities List was celebrated, it does little to mask the fact that El Cerrito remains financially precarious. Temporary measures continue to provide only short-lived relief, leaving systemic issues unaddressed.

The Road Ahead

For El Cerrito to emerge from this prolonged period of financial instability, city leadership must adopt bold, forward-thinking strategies that prioritize long-term sustainability over short-term fixes. Transparent budgeting, meaningful community engagement, and accountability are essential for charting a new course.

Residents of El Cerrito deserve more than just staying off a list—they deserve a city that is resilient, well-managed, and capable of meeting their needs for generations to come.

El Cerrito Holiday Closure: A City on Pause, But Not Its Paychecks

This holiday season, El Cerrito residents will find city offices closed from Friday, December 20, 2024, through Friday, January 3, 2025. While City Hall resumes regular business hours on Monday, January 6, 2025, the question remains: Why does a small city like El Cerrito shut down entirely for two weeks, leaving no coverage for public services?

Millennials and Gen Z residents want accountability like Boomers and Gen Xers

A Big City Paycheck for Small City Oversight

El Cerrito’s City Manager is paid on a scale comparable to leaders of much larger municipalities—cities with far greater populations, budgets, and responsibilities. Yet, those larger cities typically manage to remain operational during the holidays. They implement staggered schedules or limited staffing to ensure the public’s needs are met. El Cerrito, on the other hand, appears to take a different approach, with a full closure that halts city services entirely.

While residents wait for services to resume, city management continues to receive full compensation. This includes the city manager’s salary, which is notably high relative to the city’s size and scope. The optics of such compensation, paired with a complete shutdown, leave many questioning whether city leadership is truly aligned with the needs of its taxpayers.

No Coverage, No Service

Unlike El Cerrito, most municipalities—large and small—maintain at least minimal coverage during the holidays. In many cities, management ranks are structured so that everyone doesn’t take time off at the same time. Instead, time off is staggered, ensuring that public services remain accessible even during holiday breaks.

This standard practice reflects a commitment to serving the community year-round, recognizing that emergencies, maintenance issues, and other resident needs don’t pause for the holidays. Unfortunately, El Cerrito residents are left without this critical safety net, as the city opts for a complete two-week hiatus.

Residents Deserve Better

El Cerrito’s decision to close entirely for two weeks raises important questions about its priorities:

• Why are public services unavailable for an extended period when taxpayers continue to fund them?

• Why is staggered scheduling, a common practice in other municipalities, not implemented here?

• How does the city justify paying its leadership at big-city levels while delivering small-city service?

As we head into the new year, it’s time to demand better from El Cerrito’s leadership. A small city with a big paycheck for management should strive to deliver big-city standards of accessibility and service.

Let’s push for a city government that works for its residents, not just its management team. Staggered schedules and transparent leadership aren’t just options—they’re necessities for a city that values its community.

#ElCerritoAccountability

#BigPaySmallService

#CityManagerTransparency

#HolidayCoverageMatters

#ResidentFirstLeadership

#StaggeredSchedulingNow

#ElCerritoConcerns

#TaxpayerPriorities

#AccessibleCityServices

#BigCityPaySmallCityResults

The Future of El Cerrito: Are We Heading in the Right Direction?

The El Cerrito Committee for Responsible Government (ECCRG) is committed to responsible governance where projects and policies reflect the best interests of all residents.

A recent comment on our blog raises some serious concerns about the future of El Cerrito—specifically the Downtown project and its potential impacts on quality of life, property values, and community cohesion.

The commenter challenges the city’s leadership, arguing that the Plaza project prioritizes revenue generation at the expense of residents. While it’s no secret that cities need to balance budgets and boost revenues, is El Cerrito’s leadership sacrificing too much by raising taxes property in the process?

The Downtown Project: A Boon or a Burden?

City officials have framed the Plaza project as a pathway to economic growth and sustainability. The project is intended to attract new businesses, improve transportation options, and create a vibrant community hub. But not everyone sees it this way.

Critics argue that:

• Property Values and Taxes: The project could lead to lower property values and significantly higher taxes, placing an undue burden on long-time residents.

• Traffic and Congestion: Increased density and limited parking may create more congestion, particularly for those living near the El Cerrito Plaza.

• Bike Infrastructure vs. Reality: While promoting cycling aligns with sustainability goals, is it practical in El Cerrito? The commenter points out that bike racks remain largely empty, and most residents rely on cars or public transit.

Does this project truly benefit El Cerrito residents, or is it designed to attract outsiders at the community’s expense?

The Role of Leadership: Transparency and Responsibility

Good leadership means making tough choices, but it also requires transparency, accountability, and genuine engagement with the community. The commenter accuses city leaders of focusing too heavily on revenue collection while neglecting quality-of-life concerns for existing residents.

One striking point: The commenter highlights a perceived divide between hillside residents and those living near the Plaza. If true, this suggests a lack of unity in how different parts of the city are impacted by policy decisions.

Are city leaders engaging all stakeholders, or are many voices being left out of the conversation?

A Changing Vision for El Cerrito

As El Cerrito evolves, it’s clear that the decisions made today will shape the city for decades to come. Projects like the Plaza redevelopment aim to address current challenges, such as housing and economic growth, but they must do so without eroding the character and livability of the community.

Some questions we must consider:

1. How can we ensure that growth benefits everyone in El Cerrito?

2. What role should residents play in shaping major projects?

3. Are we prioritizing short-term revenue gains over long-term community well-being?

The Next Decade

The commenter warns that the next decade for El Cerrito may bring increased taxes, lower property values, and reduced quality of life. While this is a dire prediction, it also serves as a call to action. Residents have the power to shape the future by:

• Attending city council meetings and speaking out on issues that matter.

• Engaging with community groups to demand greater transparency and accountability.

• Voting for leaders who prioritize community needs over personal interests.

What Do You Think?

The ECCRG is here to amplify your voice. We want to hear from you:

• Do you agree with the concerns raised about the Downtown project?

• What do you see as the biggest challenges facing El Cerrito in the coming years?

• How can we work together to create a balanced and thriving community?

Let’s keep the conversation going. The future of El Cerrito depends on all of us.

Join the discussion in the comments below or reach out to ECCRG directly. Together, we can hold leadership accountable and ensure our city thrives for all who live here.

#ElCerrito #ECCRG #DowntownDevelopment #CommunityFirst #ResponsibleLeadership #QualityOfLife #Transparency #Accountability #ElCerritoFuture #BikeInfrastructure #LocalGovernment #PropertyValues #CitizenEngagement #Sustainability #UrbanPlanning