Both the Mercury News and East Bay Times endorse a NO vote on El Cerrito’s Measure G. This measure seeks to make a 1% increase in the city’s sales tax permanent, pushing the combined rate to 10.25%. El Cerrito’s tax rate would remain one of the highest in California, despite an ongoing history of fiscal mismanagement and near-bankruptcy.
The 1.5% city tax stems from two ballot measures: a 0.5% tax from 2008 and a temporary increase doubled to 1% in 2014, set to expire in 2027. Measure G aims to make this increase permanent. While the city attorney Sky Woodruff’s analysis suggests voters could repeal the tax in the future, the reality is far more complex, effectively making this tax “permanent.”
With El Cerrito’s fiscal struggles, including past deceptive taxpayer-funded campaigns to raise taxes, residents deserve accountability, not indefinite tax hikes. Rejecting Measure G is a stand for fiscal responsibility and the opportunity for voters to reassess their taxes.
In recent months, El Cerrito has ramped up efforts to move forward with a new library project, spending over $186,000 in legal fees and significant amounts on polling residents. The City has long neglected the library, offering limited hours and resources, so why the sudden urgency to push through a new, costly project?
The likely answer: they want the $300 “forever tax.”
Is the $300 “Forever Tax” the Real Goal?
While the City Manager may tout the library project as a community enhancement, it appears that the real motivation behind the push for a new library is financial. The $300 supplemental property tax is a permanent source of revenue for the City, and securing this tax increase could significantly bolster the City’s coffers. This “forever tax” will place the financial burden squarely on homeowners, providing the City with long-term funding without a clear plan for how those dollars will be spent beyond the initial project.
Instead of focusing on direct improvements to the library, such as extending hours or providing better services, the City seems to be prioritizing a large-scale development tied to a tax increase that will last indefinitely. The rush to make this project happen and the extensive use of polling and legal firms suggest that the City is more focused on securing this revenue stream than on addressing the actual needs of the community.
Polling and Legal Costs: Why Spend So Much?
The City’s investment in polling is an effort to shape public opinion and ensure the tax measure passes. They want to frame the conversation around the benefits of a new library without acknowledging the significant costs or providing residents with clear alternatives. Polling residents is not about listening to their concerns but rather about finding the messaging that will get the desired outcome: approving the tax increase.
At the same time, the legal expenses reflect the complexities of the broader development project, which goes beyond simply constructing a new library. The legal firms are helping the City navigate land use regulations, developer contracts, and tax arrangements. The use of firms like Meyers Nave—known for handling high-stakes legal challenges—signals that this is not just a library project, but a larger financial and real estate strategy.
One might ask: if the City is simply providing space for a new library, why need such extensive legal services? The answer lies in the broader development plan, which includes housing, adding another layer of complexity. The City’s involvement in this project is driving up legal fees and complicating what should be a more straightforward library improvement.
Why Residents Are Concerned
After years of neglect, the sudden focus on the library project raises red flags for residents. The $300 “forever tax” is a significant financial commitment, and many feel that they are not getting enough say in where the library will be located, how much it will cost, or how their tax dollars will be spent. Moreover, the City has not been transparent about the full scope of the project, particularly regarding the partnership with housing developers and the long-term financial implications for taxpayers.
The polling and legal maneuvers suggest that the City is more interested in securing the tax increase than in genuinely improving library services. Residents deserve a voice in these decisions, and they must demand transparency and accountability from their local government.
A Call for Transparency
The real question is: why has the City Manager prioritized the library now? It seems more likely that the goal is securing the permanent tax increase rather than providing meaningful improvements to the community’s library services. Residents deserve a clear explanation of how their tax dollars are being used and should be involved in deciding the future of this project.
Without a clear financial plan and without involving residents in meaningful ways, the future of the El Cerrito Library project remains shrouded in doubt. The City must open its decision-making process to public scrutiny, offering full transparency and enabling true resident participation.
Contact Your Officials
If you’re concerned about the future of El Cerrito’s library and the lack of transparency in the project, contact your City Manager and City Council members today. Demand clarity on the decisions being made with your tax dollars.
The residents of El Cerrito deserve to have a clear say in this project. Your involvement is crucial to ensure transparency, accountability, and a library that truly serves the community’s needs. Make your voice heard by attending City Council meetings and demanding answers from those who control your tax dollars.
As a concerned citizen of El Cerrito, I am deeply worried about the City Council’s support for Proposition 5, which would lower the required voter approval threshold for bonds from 67% to just 55%. On the surface, it may seem like a small change, but in practice, it opens the door for risky, taxpayer-funded projects that leave us footing the bill without any real say in how the funds are managed.
Here’s the situation: El Cerrito City Council is counting on Prop 5 to pass so they can move forward with a $21 million bond for a large-scale apartment project. This development, planned for the Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) site on the corner of Liberty and Fairmont, would include 240 units and a new library space. But there’s a catch — repayment of this bond would come solely from a supplemental property tax assessment on El Cerrito property owners, not from any rental income generated by the complex. That’s right: not a single dollar from rents would go towards paying back the bond. By law, the only guarantee of repayment is our property taxes.
To put it bluntly, this setup means that taxpayers like you and I would essentially be giving the city a $21 million “grant” to become co-developers and co-owners of this complex. And while that might sound good to some, it’s a risky proposition for those of us who are being asked to fund it. Think about it: once the bond is repaid, the city starts collecting rent, but at what cost? If the goal is to replace the library, why not do so at its current location, without the added complexity and cost of a 240-unit apartment building?
Let’s face it, this isn’t just about building a library or affordable housing. This is about the city taking on a high-stakes role in a private-sector project, funded entirely by our tax dollars. And while the city and developers may see this as a way to boost “equity” and lower leverage, the real equity at stake here is ours — the taxpayers who will be burdened with an assessment that gives us no real ownership or control.
That’s why I’m supporting William Ktsanes for City Council. With his background in finance, William understands the complexities and long-term impacts of these types of projects. He knows that the city can accomplish its goals without placing such a heavy financial burden on property owners. He has the insight to seek fiscally responsible solutions that prioritize the needs of residents rather than risky financial undertakings that leave us vulnerable.
Prop 5 may make it easier for projects like these to get off the ground, but that doesn’t mean it’s right for our community. I’m voting No on Prop 5 and casting my vote for William Ktsanes because El Cerrito deserves a councilmember who will prioritize prudent financial management and put residents first.
Let’s keep our city accountable and protect our tax dollars from unnecessary risk.
As Californians head to the polls, residents across the state, including those in El Cerrito, are being asked to consider a host of tax increases and new government bonds. These ballot measures aim to generate hundreds of millions in local revenue through new taxes and bonds, with over two dozen cities, counties, and school districts requesting taxpayer funds — despite not having published their 2024 financial statements. For El Cerrito, a city facing significant budgetary and accountability challenges, these decisions carry particular weight.
El Cerrito’s Financial Landscape
El Cerrito has faced scrutiny in recent years for its financial management practices. Residents are familiar with issues related to transparency, as the city has occasionally struggled with timely financial reporting and addressing structural budget shortfalls. we called attention to the city’s challenges in keeping up with best practices for municipal financial reporting, highlighting the importance of updated and accurate audits.
As El Cerrito residents are asked to support new taxes, and continue existing taxes, we face the pressing question: How can they make an informed decision without clear insight into the city’s fiscal health? For many, the lack of a current Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) raises concerns about how taxpayer funds are allocated and whether El Cerrito can afford additional debt or increased spending commitments.
The Accountability Gap: Missing ACFRs Across California
El Cerrito’s situation is not unique. Many California municipalities, counties, and school districts are seeking new funds without presenting updated financial information. Each year, local governments are required to publish an ACFR, which offers insight into their revenues, expenditures, assets, liabilities, and overall fiscal activities. However, this year, numerous local entities, including Humboldt County and the City of Woodland, have yet to release these reports. Without an up-to-date ACFR, taxpayers lack the information necessary to gauge whether their local government is effectively managing existing resources before requesting more.
For El Cerrito residents, the question of financial transparency is especially pressing as past state auditor reports have indicated areas of concern, including rising pension obligations, underfunded city services, and challenges with balancing the budget. These issues echo broader concerns across California, where municipal debt has surged to almost $1.6 trillion. In El Cerrito, as in other cities, increased taxes or bonds could act as a stopgap for more profound, underlying financial concerns.
Key Questions for El Cerrito Voters
El Cerrito voters considering tax measures should ask the following:
1. What is El Cerrito’s current financial position? Understanding where the city stands financially is crucial. Are revenues in line with expenses? How are public funds being spent?
2. Is the latest financial report available? If El Cerrito has not published its 2024 ACFR, residents should question whether approving new taxes is responsible without seeing a clear fiscal picture.
3. What other options exist for revenue generation? Are there alternatives to taxing residents further, such as selling or leasing city-owned property, reallocating funds, or improving efficiency?
4. How much debt does El Cerrito already carry, and what is the city’s debt management strategy? What is the city’s long-term plan to handle outstanding obligations like pensions, which are a known burden on El Cerrito’s budget?
5. How will additional taxes impact residents? El Cerrito residents, especially those on fixed incomes or from low-income households, could feel the impact of increased taxes. How is the city addressing these concerns?
Transparency and Accountability in El Cerrito
Given El Cerrito’s ongoing financial hurdles, transparency in government spending is essential to regain public trust. The California Policy Center’s resources, such as the Municipal Finance Triage Guide and Local Fiscal Health Dashboard, can be invaluable for residents to independently evaluate El Cerrito’s fiscal health.
Conclusion: Informed Voting in El Cerrito
While addressing local needs through taxes and bonds can be necessary, sustainable budgeting requires transparency and accountability. El Cerrito residents deserve a full understanding of how their tax dollars are being used and the current financial health of their city before agreeing to new financial commitments. Without an updated ACFR, it becomes challenging for El Cerrito’s citizens to gauge whether their local government is responsibly handling their money. As voters head to the polls, they should demand transparency and prudent financial management from their elected officials to ensure El Cerrito is set up for long-term fiscal health.
As the deadline to run for office neared, incumbent insider Tessa Rudnick decided not to seek re-election. In response, the insiders quickly rallied behind Courtney Helion as their candidate. However, Helion’s lack of financial expertise is alarming, especially when combined with her unwavering support for the city manager, despite the glaring issues facing El Cerrito.
If you’re satisfied with the city being on the state auditor’s high-risk list for over 3.5 years, holding a troubling BBB credit rating, the lack of a senior center, and the absence of meaningful debate at council meetings, then Courtney Helion might be your choice. But for those who see a need for change, finance professional William Ktsanes is the clear alternative.
With Lisa Motoyama and Rebecca Saltzman likely winners of two of the available seats, the third comes down to a decision between Ktsanes and Helion. Ktsanes, with his financial expertise, offers a much-needed change to address the city’s pressing financial issues. Helion, on the other hand, continues to praise a city manager under whose leadership spending has soared, services have been cut, and El Cerrito’s financial health has worsened.
In fact, Courtney Helion’s recent email campaign presents contradictions. During the League of Women Voters forum, she opposed the idea of a senior center, but now she claims to support it. She’s also suddenly talking about transparency—after hearing these very concerns from other citizens and co-opting them into her platform. She’s also still firmly supporting the $300 “forever” tax for library.
El Cerrito voters, don’t be misled. Courtney Helion is aligned with those responsible for closing the senior center, and she stands firmly behind the city manager, whose leadership has contributed to the city’s financial crisis. El Cerrito is currently ranked 13th out of approximately 400 California cities most likely to go bankrupt. The city manager has failed to provide clear answers on these troubling finances, and if Helion is elected, it’s likely she will continue to follow the same failed path.
As Rebecca Saltzman, a current BART Director, runs for El Cerrito City Council, her track record of leadership at BART raises significant concerns. Her tenure at BART has been marred by financial mismanagement, safety concerns, and questionable policy decisions. Under her watch, BART now faces a $7 million payout to six former employees, thanks to a federal jury’s ruling on the COVID vaccine mandate.
Leading BART to Financial Ruin
Saltzman has played a key role in BART’s financial decisions, many of which have left the agency teetering on the edge of a fiscal cliff. One glaring issue is the failure to address rampant fare evasion, which has severely impacted revenue. Instead of implementing effective measures to curb fare evasion and protect BART’s budget, Saltzman’s leadership has allowed these issues to fester, putting additional strain on an already struggling transit system.
Ignoring Safety and Fare Evasion
Beyond financial woes, Saltzman has also presided over a decline in safety for both passengers and staff. The rise in fare evasion is not just a financial issue but also a safety concern, as fare evasion often correlates with other safety risks. Recently, one patron was pushed in front of a train by a transient Despite these glaring issues, Saltzman has been slow to enact meaningful policies to protect BART’s riders and workforce. This inaction raises questions about how she would prioritize the safety and financial health of El Cerrito if elected to the City Council.
The COVID Vaccine Mandate Controversy
Most recently, Saltzman’s oversight at BART has resulted in a $7 million legal settlement. Six former BART employees who were fired due to the agency’s COVID vaccine mandate successfully sued, claiming their religious exemptions were not accommodated. While BART initially granted vaccine exemptions, the plaintiffs argued they were not offered reasonable accommodations, such as working remotely or regular COVID testing, which led to their termination. A federal jury sided with the plaintiffs, awarding each over $1 million—a costly verdict for an agency already struggling to stay afloat.
What Does This Mean for El Cerrito?
As Saltzman campaigns for El Cerrito City Council, voters should scrutinize her record at BART. Her failure to address critical issues like fare evasion and safety, combined with her role in the costly vaccine mandate lawsuit, raises serious doubts about her ability to lead effectively. Can El Cerrito afford to take on leadership with such a track record? Voters must consider whether Saltzman’s decision-making at BART reflects the type of leadership they want for their city.
Saltzman’s legacy at BART is one of financial missteps and increased risks for the public and staff. As she seeks a new role in El Cerrito, it’s crucial for voters to weigh the consequences of her policies and the impact they could have on the city’s future.
In El Cerrito, a growing concern has emerged regarding the high salaries of city management staff, many of whom do not even live in the city. While they benefit from their generous wages, these employees are largely insulated from the very taxes they approve or advocate for. Instead, the burden of these increasing taxes falls squarely on the residents of El Cerrito, who are often struggling to keep up with rising costs.
Time to Act Take Action Move Forward Clock
A quick look at the top wage earners in the city reveals a pattern: most of them reside outside of El Cerrito, often in cities or counties with lower tax burdens. They enjoy the benefit of a high salary, funded by local taxpayers, without having to face the same level of financial responsibility that comes with living here. For them, raising taxes is just another way to maintain their standard of living, knowing they won’t have to foot the bill.
On the other hand, a few employees, such as the City Manager and Chief of Police, do live in El Cerrito. But with their generous salaries, they are shielded from the everyday struggles many residents face. Their high earnings make increased taxes less impactful on their personal budgets. In other words, the same high taxes that can devastate an average household in El Cerrito have little impact on their lifestyles. This leaves many residents wondering if those in charge truly understand the weight of the financial decisions they’re making.
What’s more concerning is that, with no clear performance objectives, there is little incentive for crime or fire prevention. The current structure doesn’t prioritize efficient city services or cost savings for residents. Without goals tied to outcomes, such as reducing crime rates or improving fire prevention and preparedness, the high salaries are simply maintaining a status quo rather than driving positive change. This lack of accountability leads to complacency and unnecessary spending, all at the expense of hardworking El Cerritans who deserve better services and financial responsibility.
This situation presents a clear imbalance. It’s easy to support tax increases when they don’t affect your personal bottom line. Meanwhile, the residents of El Cerrito—many of whom are on fixed or modest incomes—are the ones forced to pay for these decisions. It’s time we rethink the fairness of this system and start holding city leadership accountable for decisions that primarily benefit those who live elsewhere.
El Cerrito’s fiscal challenges need real solutions, not just another round of tax increases to support the wage growth of non-resident employees. We need city leadership that understands the financial realities of living here and is committed to making decisions that benefit all residents, not just those who draw a paycheck from the city and live elsewhere.
El Cerritans, it’s time to demand accountability from our city leaders! We must ask for transparency on how our tax dollars are being spent and ensure that those who are making these decisions have our best interests at heart—not their own paychecks. Let’s push for responsible financial management that prioritizes residents’ needs over the enrichment of non-resident employees. We also need clear performance objectives for crime prevention, fire safety, and service efficiency so we can see tangible improvements in our community. Reach out to your city council members and make your voice heard. Our future depends on it.
El Cerrito residents are staring down the barrel of a probable $300 “forever” tax measure on the 2025 ballot. Many are skeptical, given the City’s history of reneging on promises made during previous tax campaigns. Already burdened by high taxes, including the Real Property Transfer Tax (RPTT) that hit us when purchasing our home, we now face another financial responsibility, despite recent reductions in library hours. Here’s a breakdown of what we’ve been dealing with: see e
Measure X: Supporting Contra Costa County’s Essential Services
Passed by voters on November 3, 2020, Measure X is a 20-year initiative funded by a ½ cent sales tax. This tax began collection on April 1, 2021, aiming to sustain the regional hospital, community health centers, emergency response capabilities, and crucial safety-net services. However, the regional hospital closed, community health centers are limited, and emergency response capabilities have not been recaptured from Kensington. Additionally, this measure did not yield measurable results in early childhood services, protecting vulnerable populations, and maintaining essential county services.
Measure R: Sustaining El Cerrito’s Community Services
In November 2014, El Cerrito residents voted to extend Measure R, a one percent sales tax, until March 31, 2027. Renewal of this tax will be yet another forever tax- meaning there is no sunset. The one percent tax, originally passed in 2010, was intended to maintain essential services like rapid 9-1-1 responses, neighborhood police patrols, crime prevention, fire protection, and the upkeep of city parks and recreational facilities.
On July 16, the City Council voted to renew this tax as a forever tax.
The City Council’s annual budget process now allows the community to attend and even participate, but none of the community input was implemented in the budget, and the “so-called” independent audits have not ensured fiscal accountability.
Measure V: El Cerrito’s Real Property Transfer Tax
Enacted in November 2018, Measure V introduced a Real Property Transfer Tax at $12 per $1,000 of property value. This tax was intended to fund the library at the station. Yet, none of the $20+ million collected under Measure V has been allocated for this purpose. Instead, these funds were misappropriated to cover irresponsible fiscal management. There’s no reason to trust that any new tax measure will be handled differently than Measure V.
Broken Promises and Growing Skepticism
Remember the tax to “improve” El Cerrito High School in 2012? The City Council voted unanimously to support it, promising better student scores. Yet, education quality remains poor, and the “temporary” sales tax has become permanent. Our small city now has one of the highest tax rates in the country.
Controversial Tax Proposals and Fiscal Accountability
El Cerrito is currently promoting a perpetual $300 tax aimed at funding a new library. However, skepticism surrounds this proposal due to unfulfilled promises from past tax measures. There are concerns that once the library is funded, leftover funds may be diverted to the general fund, potentially setting the stage for future tax initiatives aimed at covering ongoing budget deficits.
Measure G: A City with High Taxes and High Crime
Despite having one of the highest per capita tax rates in the country, El Cerrito struggles with one of the highest crime rates per capita. We fund one of the largest police departments in the area, yet safety remains a pressing concern. Meanwhile, the senior center was shuttered, and funding for the library was slashed.
This situation underscores the need for transparent and accountable fiscal management to maintain public trust and ensure the effective use of taxpayer money before we will approve another tax measure.
If you want to end forever tsx measures vote NO on measure G. Force the city to implement reasonable 8-12 year sunset dates.
In March 2021, the California State Auditor released a report warning that El Cerrito was the 6th most likely among 400+ cities in California to face bankruptcy. This report outlined serious concerns about the city’s overspending, poor budgeting practices, and insufficient efforts to address financial challenges. Under City Manager Karen Pinkos, who took office in 2018, the city’s financial health has only “missed opportunities”.
Despite the urgency of these issues, they have not been resolved—and El Cerrito is now ranked as the 13th most likely city in California to go bankrupt.
2021 State Auditor’s Report
Key Findings from the State Auditor’s Report
The auditor’s report, “Excessive Spending and Insufficient Efforts to Address Its Perilous Financial Condition Jeopardize the City’s Ongoing Fiscal Viability”, highlighted the following major concerns:
Continual Overspending: For years, El Cerrito has spent more than it brought in, causing deficits in the general fund. The city relies heavily on short-term loans to cover budget gaps, and the costs continue to mount. Despite this, no significant reforms have been introduced to rein in expenses:“Because It Consistently Overspends, El Cerrito Is in a Weak Financial Position, as Demonstrated by a Deficit in Its General Fund, Reliance on Costly Short-Term Loans, and Rising Pension Costs.”
Pension Liabilities: El Cerrito’s massive pension liabilities continue to grow. The administration under Pinkos has made no effort to pay more than the minimum contribution required, despite the increasing burden these pensions place on the city’s budget. The city has yet to develop a viable plan to reduce this long-term liability:“According to El Cerrito’s finance director, the city does not plan to pay more than the minimum required employer contribution each year.”
Inadequate Infrastructure and Capital Funding: The city’s infrastructure remains neglected, and capital projects have been delayed for years. At the current pace of spending, it would take more than 50 years to address even the most basic infrastructure needs:“Because of its financial condition, El Cerrito has delayed efforts to address the maintenance and repair of its facilities and the development of needed capital projects.”
Declining Bond Ratings: A Red Flag
During Karen Pinkos’ tenure, El Cerrito’s bond ratings have steadily declined, further evidence of the city’s deteriorating financial health. A downgrade by both S&P and Moody’s reflected concerns about the city’s ability to manage its finances and pay its obligations. Declining bond ratings are a direct reflection of how poorly the city’s finances have been handled under Pinkos’ leadership. This impacts the city’s ability to borrow money for essential projects and increases the cost of existing debt.
The bond rating agencies have cited El Cerrito’s structural deficit, reliance on reserves, and rising pension costs as reasons for the downgrade. Yet, despite these warnings, no effective measures have been taken to improve the city’s financial standing.
Sexual Harassment Settlement: Another Burden
Adding to the city’s financial woes is the $544,000 settlement El Cerrito paid in 2021 to resolve a sexual harassment lawsuit. The settlement stemmed from a complaint against a city official, further straining the already precarious city budget. This settlement is not only a financial burden, but it also underscores a lack of dedication to employee well-being under Karen Pinkos’ leadership. The mishandling of such a serious issue indicates broader concerns about the work environment and employee protections, reflecting poorly on the city’s overall commitment to supporting its staff.
Problems Persist: No Real Solutions
Despite the glaring warning signs from the State Auditor six years ago, declining bond ratings, and costly legal settlements, these critical issues have not been resolved. Nearly three years after the State Auditor’s report, El Cerrito’s financial situation remains precarious. No comprehensive plan has been introduced to address the city’s long-term budget crisis, overspending continues, and pension liabilities loom larger than ever. Meanwhile, the city’s infrastructure remains underfunded, and residents are still left in the dark about the true state of the city’s finances.
Prior to the 2021 report, the state auditor sent TWO letters of concern to El Cerrito. After 6 years she should be years well into the strategic plan implementation. The concept of a plan is woefully inadequate.
Lack of Transparency and Misleading the Public
Karen Pinkos has continuously demonstrated a lack of transparency in how the city communicates its financial situation. The city manager has misled residents on multiple occasions, particularly regarding the true extent of El Cerrito’s debts. In public presentations, Pinkos downplayed the city’s $90 million in unfunded pension liabilities, falsely claiming that the city has “very little debt.” This misrepresentation has allowed her administration to deflect scrutiny while asking residents to pay higher taxes without explaining where their money is going. she maintains that all of the state auditors concerns have been addressed. Nothing could be further from the truth.
The lack of open communication has left El Cerrito residents in the dark about the real state of the city’s finances. As a result, citizens are making decisions based on incomplete and often misleading information.
Misaligned Priorities and Strategic Failures
Pinkos has continuously demonstrated an inability to align city priorities with fiscal realities. Instead of focusing on long-term financial stability, she has pursued non-strategic priorities that only exacerbate the city’s fiscal problems. For instance, while infrastructure continues to crumble and pension liabilities grow, Pinkos purchased a $1.5million building while more important capital needs remain unmet. She has expanded administrative ranks and hired costly consultants. These decisions have added further strain on the city’s budget, offering little in return to the community.
Misleading Residents to Secure Tax Increases
Perhaps the most troubling aspect of Karen Pinkos’ leadership is her administration’s use of misleading tactics to secure public support for higher taxes. Residents have been asked to approve tax increases under the premise that essential services will be cut without them. However, despite these taxes, financial mismanagement continues, with little accountability for how those funds are being spent.
Residents have a right to ask: Is this tax really necessary, or is it just another Band-Aid solution to cover up ongoing fiscal mismanagement?
Why Karen Pinkos is Not Fit to Run El Cerrito
Karen Pinkos has had years to address these issues, yet the evidence shows that under her leadership, El Cerrito continues to spiral deeper into financial trouble. Her administration has shown no real commitment to fixing the underlying problems:
Overspending has not been controlled.
Pension liabilities of $90 million remain unfunded, with no strategy to address them.
Essential infrastructure continues to deteriorate.
Residents have been misled, and transparency remains a serious issue.
Declining bond ratings – BBB reflects the growing concern of external agencies over the city’s financial health.
A $544,000 sexual harassment settlement has further burdened the city’s finances and highlights a lack of dedication to employee well-being.
El Cerrito is now ranked 13th most likely to go bankrupt in California. This is among approximately 400 cities, which means approximately 390 CA cities are better managed than El Cerrito
Pinkos has demonstrated time and again that she lacks the strategic vision, financial discipline, and leadership skills necessary to turn El Cerrito around. The same issues identified in the March 2021 State Auditor’s report persist today, with no indication that the city is on a path toward fiscal stability.
The Path Forward
El Cerrito cannot afford another year of Karen Pinkos’ leadership. The city needs a leader who values transparency, fiscal responsibility, and strategic planning. Without these qualities, the future of El Cerrito remains at risk, with financial mismanagement continuing to jeopardize essential services and the quality of life for its residents.
The time has come for a change—El Cerrito deserves leadership that is committed to real solutions, not more Band-Aids, misdirection, and inaction. Our city’s future depends on it.
In recent years, the City of El Cerrito has developed a reputation for confusing its residents with misleading initiatives, and the latest Measure G is no exception. The ballot language appears to indicate that the proposal is for a “1 cent” sales tax, but in reality, it represents a 1 percent sales tax. While the difference may seem subtle, the financial implications are significant.
A 1 cent tax is understood by most residents to be a fixed, nominal amount, while a 1 percent tax directly correlates to a percentage of every transaction. This deceptive wording creates the illusion that the financial burden would be minor when, in fact, it is far more substantial. If passed, Measure G would generate approximately $4 million annually for the city, as the flyer itself mentions.
This isn’t the first time El Cerrito has been accused of such tactics. The city has a history of providing unclear information on financial matters, making it difficult for residents to fully grasp the long-term impact of such measures. The language of Measure G is crafted to soften the blow of what is effectively a tax increase, despite the “no tax increase” messaging.
City leadership would like you to believe the tax isn’t a “forever “tax, but there’s no sunset. Effectively, it’s “forever” tax as it would take considerable time and financial resources to repeal the tax.
The citizens of El Cerrito deserve transparency, especially when it comes to initiatives that affect their wallets. Misleading language only erodes trust in local government, and Measure G, with its unclear terms, is another move in a series of actions that undermines that trust. If you’re voting, be sure to understand the true nature of the proposal before making your decision.
In a startling comparison between two neighboring cities, El Cerrito and Hercules, we find an alarming disparity that should concern every resident and taxpayer in El Cerrito. Both cities cover roughly four square miles and serve similar populations, yet El Cerrito’s staff size is nearly twice that of Hercules. This bloated staff not only burdens the city’s salary costs but also inflates pension liabilities, contributing significantly to El Cerrito’s enormous $90 million unfunded pension liability.
The Impact of Inflated Staffing
Why does this matter? The answer is simple: money. The larger the staff, the higher the salary and medical premium costs. But that’s just the beginning. Each additional employee also adds to the city’s pension obligations, which are already unsustainable. El Cerrito’s unfunded pension liability is a ticking time bomb, currently at $90 million and the city’s inability to manage its staff size responsibly is adding fuel to the fire.
Hercules, by contrast, manages to operate with roughly half the employees of El Cerrito. This isn’t due to a lack of services or lower standards; it’s the result of smarter, more efficient management and resource deployment. Hercules demonstrates that it is possible to run a city of this size effectively without burdening the taxpayers with unnecessary costs.
Management, Not Unions, at Fault
This is not an issue with the unions, as some might suggest. The problem lies squarely with city management. The City Manager, who is responsible for determining the size of the city staff, also sets the raises and pension benefits. Unfortunately, the El Cerrito City Council has gone along with this reckless expansion of the city’s payroll, approving these decisions without sufficient scrutiny.
It’s worth noting that many of the highest-paid staff in El Cerrito, including the City Clerk, are not even unionized. Despite this, they command salaries + benefits of $275,000 or more, a figure that is not only excessive but unsustainable for a city of just 25,000 people.
A Call for Accountability
El Cerrito’s inflated staff size is a glaring example of mismanagement. The City Manager’s decisions have cost the public buckets of money, and the long-term impact on the city’s financial health could be catastrophic. The comparison with Hercules should serve as a wake-up call. It is possible to run a city of this size efficiently, with fewer staff and lower costs, without sacrificing the quality of services.
The El Cerrito City Council must take immediate action to right-size the city’s staff and implement stricter oversight of the City Manager’s decisions. The current path is unsustainable and will only lead to further financial strain on the city’s residents.
It’s time for a change in how El Cerrito is managed—before it’s too late.
In a city like El Cerrito, staying informed about local government actions is key to ensuring transparency and accountability. The El Cerrito Committee for Responsible Government (ECCRG) is dedicated to keeping residents up to date on financial and civic matters that directly impact their community. Unlike divisive groups, ECCRG’s mission is to provide clear, actionable information to empower residents, especially when the city lacks transparency.
Promoting Awareness and Accountability
ECCRG plays a critical role in helping El Cerrito residents understand the financial, political, and community decisions that shape their city. At times, official city communications may lack detail or clarity, and ECCRG steps in to ensure that residents receive the full picture. Here’s how:
Bridging Information Gaps: ECCRG offers detailed analysis on city finances, budgets, and governance decisions, especially in cases where transparency is limited. This lets residents be fully informed about the issues that affect them most.
Encouraging Civic Engagement: ECCRG urges residents to actively participate in local government by attending city council and Financial Advisory Board (FAB) meetings, where key decisions are made. Resident involvement is crucial to holding officials accountable and ensuring their voices are heard.
Advocating for Fiscal Responsibility: ECCRG monitors city financial practices, ensuring responsible spending and transparency. The committee provides insights and recommendations to prevent mismanagement and promote better financial stewardship for the community.
When Are Blogs Like This One Necessary?
In an ideal world, local governments provide open, honest, and clear communication to their residents, and local newspapers focus on highlighting city events, governance issues, and public decisions. In cities where these conditions exist, blogs like this one may be unnecessary. When the government operates transparently, residents can easily access information on public meetings, financial decisions, and policy changes through official channels or local media.
However, when city communication is unclear, incomplete, or difficult to access—and when local newspapers are unable or unwilling to focus on these important matters—communities like El Cerrito need alternative sources of information. ECCRG fills this gap by providing residents with the details and transparency that are sometimes lacking. Until the city consistently practices open communication and accountability, organizations like ECCRG remain essential to ensuring that the public stays informed and engaged.
Divisiveness vs. Providing Essential Information
It is important to differentiate between creating division and providing necessary information to empower residents. ECCRG’s goal is to inform, unite, and ensure accountability, not to divide. Here’s the key difference:
Accountability Without Division: Divisive groups often aim to stir conflict and polarization. ECCRG, however, fosters unity by bringing residents together around shared values of responsible governance and fiscal transparency.
Filling Information Gaps for Clarity, Not Conflict: When the City of El Cerrito fails to fully disclose or explain its decisions, ECCRG provides the missing information. This is not about creating division; it’s about ensuring that residents have all the facts needed to participate in meaningful discussions and decisions.
Constructive Criticism, Not Polarization: ECCRG’s approach is to offer solutions, not just criticism. The committee advocates for improvements and reforms in governance, promoting a better, more efficient city for all residents.
Take Action: Attend Upcoming Meetings and Contact Officials
Participation is key to driving meaningful change. ECCRG encourages all residents to get involved by attending these crucial meetings:
City Council Meeting: October 15, 2024, at 6:00 PM, City Hall
Financial Advisory Board (FAB) Meeting: October 22, 2024, at 6:30 PM, City Hall
These meetings provide an opportunity for residents to ask questions, offer input, and stay informed about the decisions that shape El Cerrito’s future.
In addition to attending meetings, residents are encouraged to write to the City Manager and City Councilmembers to express concerns and share feedback. Contact information for city officials is provided below:
Now is the time to act. Attend City Council and FAB meetings, reach out to city officials, and engage with the El Cerrito Committee for Responsible Government to help ensure a more transparent, fiscally responsible, and united community. Together, we can make El Cerrito better for everyone.
Karen Pinkos, El Cerrito’s City Manager, has had more than five years to address the pressing concerns raised by the State Auditor, but rather than take meaningful action, she continues to insist that everything is just fine. This lack of transparency and failure to act has done little to reassure the residents of El Cerrito, who have been left to bear the consequences of her inaction.
Before the State Auditor’s 2021 report, two letters of concern had already been sent to El Cerrito, warning of the city’s poor financial management and operational inefficiencies. These warnings were a clear signal that change was needed, but Karen Pinkos has chosen to focus on telling everyone how well she’s doing rather than fixing the real problems.
Despite having years to turn things around, the financial mismanagement continues, and city services have declined. Residents are being told that all is well, yet they are living through higher taxes, reduced services, and a city that remains in financial distress. Pinkos’ persistent marketing of her so-called success rings hollow when faced with the facts.
During the council meeting, when asked about making budget cuts, she explained that services would have to be reduced. It’s important to note that costs have significantly increased over the past five years, yet services have not improved. Therefore, reducing costs does not automatically mean a decrease in services.
The state’s intervention should have been a wake-up call, but Karen Pinkos seems more focused on protecting her image than doing the hard work required to put El Cerrito on stable financial ground. The residents deserve better—leadership that faces reality and takes action to solve the city’s longstanding issues, not someone who dismisses warnings and pretends everything is under control.
In a performance reminiscent of the republican VP candidate’s debate tactics, El Cerrito’s City Manager, Karen Pinkos, proved herself a master at shapeshifting. She pulled out every rhetorical trick in the book to sidestep looming questions during the recent City Council meeting. It didn’t take long for the council to join in to congratulate themselves.
The topics avoided? The city’s unrestricted general fund reserve balance (or lack thereof), its embarrassing BBB bond rating, probable overstaffing, ballooning costs, and declining quality of services. Yet, instead of addressing these glaring financial issues head-on, Pinkos spent over five minutes congratulating herself and her staff on a presentation award, spinning it as if it were a genuine achievement for financial stability.
For those who aren’t aware, El Cerrito currently holds the ignominious title of the 13th worst-run city in California. The claim of financial stability couldn’t be further from the truth. How can the City Manager claim stability when residents are seeing reduced services, from park maintenance and street repairs being neglected to overall public infrastructure deteriorating? Meanwhile, the city remains overstaffed and operational costs continue to rise with no real plan to manage these issues in sight.
Financial Smoke and Mirrors
One of the most striking moments of the meeting was when City Manager Karen Pinkos danced around the question of the unrestricted reserve balance. A reserve balance is essentially the city’s rainy day fund, a key indicator of financial health. For a city like El Cerrito, which has been teetering on the edge of fiscal crisis for years, you’d think this would be a top priority. Instead, Pinkos sidestepped the question entirely, offering vague statements about “future plans” without giving any specifics. This kind of obfuscation only breeds mistrust.
And what about El Cerrito’s BBB bond rating? This low rating signifies high credit risk, making it more expensive for the city to borrow money. Rather than present a clear strategy for improving this rating, the City Manager offered more evasive answers, suggesting the city’s finances were on the mend without presenting any hard data or actions to back up these claims.
Declining Infrastructure and Ballooning Costs
The city’s deteriorating parks, paths, and streets are clear indicators of where El Cerrito’s priorities do not lie. Over the past few years, the Park Maintenance Index and Pavement Condition Index have both shown marked declines. Residents frequently report cracked sidewalks, poorly maintained park grounds, and deteriorating bike paths—all while the city continues to spend on non-essential projects and an overstaffed administration.
The city’s financial problems are exacerbated by this overstaffing, leading to a bloated budget that is becoming increasingly unsustainable. How can a city justify keeping more staff while public spaces and infrastructure continue to degrade?
When asked about this contradiction, Pinkos dodged once again, reverting to talking points about “staff retention” and “future initiatives.” What future initiatives? At a time when El Cerrito’s residents are getting less and less in return for their tax dollars, the idea of staffing up even more is baffling. There was no mention of plans to streamline operations, reduce redundancies, or even consider a hiring freeze.
Celebrating a “Presentation Award” as a Sign of Stability?
Perhaps the most insulting moment of the evening was the City Manager’s lengthy monologue praising herself and her staff for receiving a presentation award, which she framed as a “budget award.” Let’s be clear—this is not an award for sound financial management or fiscal responsibility. It’s a nod to how well a budget is presented, not how well it’s managed. To spin this into a symbol of financial stability is disingenuous at best and deceitful at worst.
We get it, Karen. You’re a master at shapeshifting, but we’re not buying it. El Cerrito’s residents deserve transparency and accountability, not more smoke and mirrors. While Pinkos and City Council members congratulated themselves, El Cerrito residents are left wondering: Where’s the transparency? Where’s the accountability? Where’s the plan to move this city away from the financial precipice?
Contact Your City Officials
If you’re tired of the non-answers, shapeshifing and dodging, it’s time to speak up. Let your voice be heard and demand real answers. Contact the City Manager and your City Council members today:
El Cerrito voters, while you can vote for up to three candidates, the El Cerrito Committee for Responsible Government urges you to cast your vote for just one or two candidates who will focus on fiscal responsibility. Newcomers Rebecca Saltzman and Courtney Helion are advocating for higher taxes, while William Ktsanes is committed to pushing for a city that prioritizes fiscal sustainability without increasing the burden on residents.
Think about the El Cerrito that we pass on to the next- generation – your children and grandchildren. Vote smart for a responsible future for El Cerrito.
For decades, El Cerrito was home to a vibrant senior center located behind the library on Stockton Avenue. The Open House Senior Center was a community hub where seniors could gather, take classes, enjoy meals, and access critical resources. However, in 2018, the West Contra Costa County School District reclaimed the building, forcing the city to move the senior center to two portable buildings next to the police department on San Pablo Avenue. Renamed the “El Cerrito Midtown Activity Center,” the center continued offering essential services—until 2020.
Never Reopened
In March 2020, the senior center was closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. While many of us hoped the closure would be temporary, the city quietly decided not to reopen the center or restore the full range of services once provided to our seniors. The city eliminated one of the portable buildings, leased the other to the Kensington Police Department, and significantly scaled back senior programming. What little remains is now hosted at the Community Center on Moeser Lane, but it pales in comparison to the offerings of a dedicated senior center.
If you’ve seen the “Senior Center” sign at Hana Gardens next to City Hall, you might be surprised to learn that it’s just an empty conference room rented out for private events—nothing more. This is not the senior center our community needs.
El Cerrito’s seniors deserve better. The pandemic is no longer an excuse, and the city must prioritize reopening a permanent, fully funded senior center. It’s time for city leadership to act.
We urge you to contact the City Manager and City Council members to demand action:
In 2016, Debora Allen joined BART BOD promising to bring common-sense leadership to the BART Board of Directors. She focused on improving the safety of BART riders and workers, bringing financial transparency to BART’s $2.4 billion annual budget, and maintaining political independence from special interest groups.
From the onset, Allen understood the immense challenges faced by BART, the nation’s fifth-largest transit agency. Her journey has been an uphill battle, consistently advocating for sound fiscal policies and common-sense measures. The pandemic and a 60% permanent loss in ridership have exacerbated these challenges, yet Allen has diligently worked to bring oversight and accountability, facing structural deficits of over $350 million annually.
Contrastingly, Rebecca Saltzman, an urban director, and majority board member, has often been at odds with Allen’s fiscally responsible approach. Saltzman’s tenure saw her focus on agendas that some argue have hindered BART’s recovery post-pandemic, contributing to its ongoing financial woes. In fact, she voted against Allen’s cost reduction requests every year Now, Saltzman has announced she will not seek re-election to the BART Board but will instead run for the El Cerrito City Council. This move has raised concerns, as she transitions from one financially troubled institution to another.
However, one might wonder if the financial turmoil BART faces also influenced her decision. Is it possible that she wants to distance herself from the fiscal challenges BART is facing, or is she genuinely motivated to bring about positive change in El Cerrito?
Saltzman’s 2024 campaign yard sign reads “experience matters” We couldn’t agree more. Saltzman has been on the BART BOD since 2012 – for 12 years
BART is grappling with severe financial difficulties driven by a sustained decline in ridership, escalating operational costs, and mounting pension liabilities. The agency’s fare revenues have not kept pace with rising expenses, particularly in areas like maintenance and pension obligations, putting additional strain on the budget. Efforts to maintain service levels have further stressed financial resources, leading to discussions about potential tax measures, fare increases, and other funding mechanisms to stabilize its financial outlook.
These issues sound strikingly similar to El Cerrito’s problems, where mismanagement and fiscal irresponsibility have plagued the city. Rebecca Saltzman, having played a role in creating these financial and operational challenges at BART, is ill-equipped to address El Cerrito’s financial crisis, given her track record of enabling similar fiscal missteps.
El Cerrito is once again teetering on the brink of bankruptcy under its current city management. Saltzman’s track record at BART, which includes significant financial and operational challenges, raises doubts about her ability to navigate El Cerrito out of its financial turmoil.
While Saltzman’s commitment to public service is evident, her move to El Cerrito’s City Council sparks debate. Will her experience at BART translate into effective governance for El Cerrito, or is this a strategic retreat from a sinking ship? Only time will reveal whether Saltzman can positively impact El Cerrito’s future and steer the city away from the brink of bankruptcy.
The City of El Cerrito continues to hold “public workshops” that are nothing more than pep rallies for the Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) library. At the last event held at the library, no information was distributed, and no relevant questions were answered. The city has little involvement in operating the library. The County has total control and funds what goes on in the library with our property taxes: people, programs, hours. The City lacks any expertise or domain knowledge in library science. So, why are they holding these “workshops”? About what, exactly?
The real reason for this dog and pony show is that the City needs the $300 per resident “forever tax” money to cover excessive spending. This tax is a perpetual burden on residents, designed to cover financial mismanagement rather than truly serving the community’s needs.
The Real Issue: Location and Cost
The real issue is simple: where is the best place to locate the library, and how much space do taxpayers want to pay for a new or renovated building? Residents want their say, but they are not getting it. Worse yet, parcel owners will foot the bill alone and not getting their say. Even non-residents have several questions about the proposed project. Many believe the alternative sitings for the library are far superior, but also think the existing library is a good fit for a new reconstruction. No one knows how the city insiders come up with “no parking” at the current library. It’s hard to understand how voters could decide on a new library without knowing what the alternatives were/are. That seems a rather undemocratic kind of “voting.”
Lack of Transparency and Questionable Financial Plans
The City has put forth plans that lack details, except they somehow plan to turn a supplemental parcel tax into $21,000,000 of proceeds for constructing the housing development, of which the library will occupy 20,000 sq ft.
Lease Agreement Negotiations: What is the City negotiating with the Contra Costa County (CCC) Library Commission Lease Agreement document? The City has no involvement in library operations other than authorizing up to more hours a week of library hours. Its only job is to provide space for a library.
Interest Payments: Who is paying the $1,600,000 interest payment on the proposal? Not the City. How does the Supplemental Property Tax collected by the CCC Tax Collector get to El Cerrito and to the entity paying the interest on the $21,000,000 that is going to be raised for construction? It’s all complicated and a bad sign.
Developer Influence and Lack of Competition
The City seems to be “captured” by the housing developer and the City Council. No other contractor wants to talk to El Cerrito because the City Council is already committed to the housing developer, to which the City made a $250,000 investment, making it clear that engaging with other contractors would be a waste of time.
A Call for Transparency and Resident Involvement
Residents deserve transparency and the ability to have a meaningful say in where their library is located and how much they will pay for it. The current process is opaque, with critical information withheld from the public. The City’s workshops should provide real answers and detailed plans, not serve as mere promotional events for pre-decided outcomes.
It’s time for the City to listen to its residents and provide the transparency and involvement they deserve. Without this, the future of the El Cerrito Library remains uncertain, and the trust in our local government continues to erode.
We urge all El Cerrito residents to demand transparency and accountability from their city officials. Attend city council meetings, ask tough questions, and insist on detailed plans and honest answers. Voice your concerns about the proposed perpetual tax and the lack of resident involvement in these critical decisions. Together, we can ensure that our community’s needs are met and that our local government truly serves its people. Join us in advocating for a library plan that reflects the desires and best interests of all residents. Your involvement is crucial. Let’s hold our City accountable and shape the future of our library together.
During Greg Lyman’s tenure on the El Cerrito City Council from 2008 to 2020, the city’s financial health sharply declined, culminating in a bond rating drop from AA- to BBB-. Lyman’s leadership failed to adapt to the city’s financial “new normal,” despite attributing the need to draw on reserves to the 2008 recession. This short-sighted approach multiplied exponentially and left El Cerrito with a staggering $100 million liability owed to CalPERS.
In his 2019 interview with the State Auditor, Lyman provided misleading information, shifting blame to external factors and neglecting his role in exacerbating the city’s financial issues. He attributed the need to dip into reserves solely to the recession, yet failed to implement necessary financial adjustments once the city’s revenue stabilized. This resulted in a continued reliance on reserves and worsening fiscal conditions for El Cerrito.
As financial troubles mounted, Lyman’s policies led to significant cuts in services for residents. Senior center programs were reduced, library hours were shortened, and city hall’s operating hours were cut—all while city employees continued to work a 37.5-hour workweek, an unsustainable approach given the city’s financial turmoil. Despite these cuts, El Cerrito’s pension obligations continued to rise, placing an even greater burden on the community.
Now, as an employee of the San Francisco City and County, Lyman is maximizing his CalPERS retirement benefits. While San Francisco’s robust financial resources can absorb these high pension payouts, the decisions made by Lyman while on the El Cerrito council have left the city struggling with unsustainable pension liabilities and reduced services for its residents.
Residents deserve better leadership in the El Cerrito Democratic Party—one that prioritizes fiscal responsibility, transparency, and the long-term financial health of the community.
For more details on Lyman’s statements during his 2019 interview, you can access the full document here.
Greg Lyman, a former City Councilmember turned El Cerrito power broker, currently serving as Treasurer for two citycouncil candidates he endorsed. Lyman has consistently pushed policies that exacerbate the city’s fiscal woes. Known for his influence on local decision-making and El Cerrito City Council candidates, Lyman has supported expanding city spending, including bloated administrative salaries and an oversized fire department that employs four battalion chiefs—far more than any other California city of similar size. Despite not having faced a major fire in years, the department’s focus remains on staffing rather than prioritizing fire prevention, which should be its main objective. This mismanagement only adds to the city’s already inflated expenses.
Similarly, the police department has one of the largest forces for a city of El Cerrito’s size, yet crime prevention has not improved in proportion to its growth. The focus has remained on staffing rather than taking proactive, data-driven approaches to reduce crime. These issues reflect Lyman’s broader pattern of fiscal irresponsibility, which leaves residents paying for inefficiencies instead of solutions.
During his tenure at City Hall as a council member, Lyman’s fiscal irresponsibility has been nothing short of damaging. Under his leadership, El Cerrito consistently overspent on salaries and pension obligations while ignoring the looming debt crisis. His lack of foresight has contributed significantly to the financial disaster the city is now grappling with. Residents are still living with the fallout from decisions made under his watch, with ballooning debt, depleted reserves, and a reliance on future tax hikes to plug financial holes. Instead of exercising fiscal restraint, Lyman’s tenure exemplified unchecked spending that has left the city teetering on the edge of bankruptcy.
One of his most controversial proposals is recent – the “$300 per year forever tax” to fund a new library. While El Cerrito does need a new library, Lyman’s advocacy for a permanent tax places an undue and unnecessary burden on the city’s residents. This tax comes on the heels of El Cerrito securing $39 million in funding for housing, making it hard to justify asking taxpayers for more. Instead of offering sustainable financial solutions, Lyman has continued his pattern of opting for short-term fixes, relying on taxpayer dollars to paper over deep-rooted problems.
It’s Time to Change the Guard Lyman’s track record proves that new leadership is essential for El Cerrito’s future. We need council members who will prioritize fiscal responsibility, focus on efficient city services, and make decisions that benefit residents, not just the city’s administration. It’s time for fresh perspectives, innovative solutions, and real accountability to take center stage in El Cerrito.
Call to Action Contact the El Cerrito City Council today and voice your opinion on Greg Lyman’s misguided financial policies and the unnecessary $300 forever tax. Let’s ensure that the city is held accountable for its fiscal decisions and that meaningful solutions are prioritized over tax hikes.
El Cerrito Committee for Responsible Government (ECCRG) 