Do Nothing City Council continues to do nothing even as the State moves El Cerrito to #6 on the state high risk list

Do Something Vs Nothing Two Way Road Signs Take Action 3d Illustration

Today the State Auditor released their annual list of cities at high risk of financial difficulties. This list is based on FY 18/19 figures which was a better year for many municipalities. However, El Cerrito dropped from #7 to #6 largely based on lack of reserves (El Cerrito not only has no reserve but owes an 8.5 million dollar loan due at the end of the fiscal year.

At the meeting on November 17, 2020, the City Council again DID NOTHING!!! Okay, Councilperson Fadelli did say that he hoped the restructuring of the police saved money. City Council did direct the City Manager to come back with more information on what Rec programs are no longer supporting themselves and what cuts are suggested. However, they did not pin the timing of that recommendation down. Both Councilpersons Fadelli and Pardue-Okimoto did say that they believed it should be ASAP and the Mayor stated the cuts should be done before the third quarter as the city manager had suggested in the recommendations with the fiscal report.

Councilperson Rochelle Pardue-Okimoto brought up the issue of the projections for sales tax and why the estimate was what it was. (see this blog post for issues with projections) She asked to compare the current sales tax with the beginning of the shut down in March. The Finance Director gave another hard to understand answer (2:49 in the video). He did say that El Cerrito gets some sales tax revenue as part of a county pool for taxes paid for online purchases which has mitigated some of the other sales tax revenue decreases. The Finance Director insists his figures are good. He also said that Honda of El Cerrito sales tax is down 49%. That is a huge financial loss of revenue for the city.

Councilperson Pardue-Okimoto also asked about Franchise Taxes. The Finance Director said it is the lowest in 4 years but he still wants to watch it until the end of the year. Because why act now! (okay I added that last part). She also questioned the business tax numbers and reflected on how that might affect sales taxes.

Councilperson Fadelli did ask about when actions would be taken. The City Manager then said any reductions would be staff reductions and thusly service reductions. She said that they have been in negotiations with unions which is necessary for staff layoffs or salary cuts. She also said she wanted to wait until the end of December. Both to have more information on city finances and because she did not want to do layoffs before the holidays. Councilperson Fadelli also asked about staff revenue projections (Thank you!) and brought up the issues raised in our last blog post. The City Manager was very dismissive of those numbers and stated no one knows how people are doing projections. I would like to very clearly state that those numbers were BASED ON ACTUAL NUMBERS for the first 4 months of the year rather than the Finance Director’s fantasies. I hope that next meeting the council members push further and specifically ask “Why are the payroll numbers being projected for the rest of the fiscal year at 200k a month less than what the actual costs have been for the first 4 months of the year.” If you send a comment to the council or a council member please ask that question. If you get an answer forward it to me at eccrfg@mgail.com.

The Finance Director dug in on his projections and the council seems unwilling or unable to really challenge him. Councilperson Pardue-Okimoto did say that his idea that things would be better in 3-6 months may not be realistic due to many reasons. (Remember she is a nurse). The vaccine could take a long time for distribution, many people will not get the vaccine, and many people have made lifestyle changes such as a parent leaving work to take care of children that means they will need recreation services less.

Everyone needs to be warned because of the slowness of staff and council to respond (was I the only one who predicted a Rec financial issue at the beginning of COVID?) the next round of cuts is going to hurt. Popular recreation programs will be cut. Beloved staff will be laid off. This is going to be painful. People are going to suffer from either losing their job or losing a needed services. And also know that if we had run a more economically efficient city and had an actual reserve this would not have been as bad as it is going to be. If staff and council had taken it seriously when the auditor first brought up that the city might not be able to continue as a going concern this would not have been so bad. No one could have predicted a pandemic but we could have had reserves.

The City Council and staff and the community are also going to have to recognize that Public Safety (Fire and Police) are over half the budget and that if we are going to dig out of this some cuts need to happen there. The county grand jury reported on police staffing in the county this year and found that El Cerrito had the second-highest ratio of police officers per 1,000 residents at 1.8 with (San Pablo was #1). The state average is 1.48 and the county average is 1.09.

Our Fire Department had 4 Battalion Chiefs to Albany’s 0 and is known to be top-heavy. (At this meeting one Battalion Chief retired-can we replace that position with an firefighter rather than a manager?) Almost no one wants to cut fire services in our city but surely there is a way to level down management and run more efficiently.

Links to articles are below as are the email addresses of our current council members.

San Francisco Chronicle article on state risk

State Auditor dashboard

El Cerrito Council Meeting November 17, 20202 video

Emails of the City Manager and City Council Members

Karen Pinkos-City Manager kpinkos@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Greg Lyman-Mayor glyman@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Paul Fadelli Vice Mayor pfadelli@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Councilperson Pardue-Okimoto rpardueokimoto@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Councilperson Janet Abelson jabelson@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Councilperson Gabe Quinto gquinto@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Things to know about the 20/21 budget

After my last post lamenting the lack of information from the city I tried one more time to get information from the Mayor and he too said just look at the budget book. It’s all there.

But it’s not. There is not a clear spelling out of the cuts made as shown here. Check out the budget book for yourselves. It is 250 pages I had to review again to try and flesh out the details of the below cuts. And why the City Clerk and Mayor both think that referring people to a 250-page document is transparent and accessible government is beyond me. But I can only fight city hall so much.

So what else should you know about the budget? (in no particular order)

  1. There were no substantive cuts in the police budget. It says above there is a 595K savings. But if you look at the budget book it says the jobs cut are the two school resource officers cut by the Board of ED (and they paid for one of them) and a vacant admin position. And any further savings is by keeping unfilled positions unfilled. (page 99).

Here is the current expenditures (page 10) Notice the police at 24.3% of the budget

Here is the prior year break down of expenditures with the police at 24.7% of the total budget. Not much difference.

2. The Finance Department considers getting a pay-day loan to keep the city afloat as one of their top achievements. (page 86)

3. The residents of El Cerrito were greatly deceived about the revenue for Measure D. At the time this was coming up I was telling anyone who would listen (and it was not many and before this blog) that Measure D was promising a lot of wonderful things but the measure did not include the same language as the tax it extended and allows a great deal of money to go to maintenance. And below we see half a million dollars going from construction to maintenance. So we can look at it as half full-at least the parks will be maintained or half empty as we were promised so many things and will get none of them from this tax. (page 56). I need to investigate more but it seems like everything from Measure H is going to maintenance now.

4. The revenue projections for the year seem really broken. Here is what was adopted. (page 27)

Here is the July-September Revenue report given at an October meeting. (page 45). So we would expect to be at about 25% of revenue expectations thru the first quarter of the year. Except for property taxes because of the timing of the receipt of those. You will notice in this chart below that the 20/21 budget has a projected INCREASE in sales taxes from 19/20. Did someone not tell the Finance Director we are in a recession and still mostly sheltering in place?

This one is revenue projections for the year. They have not made realistic projections at all. Especially in regards to sales tax which is one of our top revenue sources after property taxes. And you can see all the red at the bottom as far as what our cash flow looks like during the year even with these unrealistic expectations.

I am sure there is much more wrong in there but these are the things that came to me immediately when reviewing the budget book. Feel free to email me at eccfrg@gmail.com if you have other things you think I should take a look at.

City Council and Staff refuse to give basic information

I follow the budget pretty closely. I read the materials put online and try to translate them for the average resident who is interested but not able to dig through all the documents. I have been trying for months to get a detailed answer as to the budget cuts that have been made thus far. Not the chart below which has been repeatedly put into the packets but an exact description of what positions were cut and when and what that savings was. I know in the last packet there were many letters trying to save the job of a swim center staff person. I want to know what his job was and when it was cut and how much it saved the city. Same with the Assistant to the City Manager because I believe that job is not cut until January 1, 2021.


What restructuring was done at the Fire Department? Same with the police because we are not seeing any real drop in the police budget. It appears it might be unfilled positions cut. If the position was never filled is it really a budget cut? The funding for the landscape services-what was cut and what was moved to Measure H. This should be readily available information. I have requested it numerous times both through some council members and more recently through the city clerk. The city clerk referred me to the budget book with no citations of pages and I was unable to find anything with any more specificity than the below chart.

Mayor Lyman recently responded to a resident question by saying there were still cuts proposed in June on the table. Cuts on the table that haven’t been made?? I requested more information on that and was directed to this presentation by Management Partners. This presentation had many cuts in it but as far as I could tell they were never discussed in depth. One of the cuts was the elimination of Fire Station 72 and I know if that was ever discussed there would have been a big public outcry.

I went back and reviewed these strategies. Some of them have happened like the elimination of passport services and the library hours were decided not to be cut. Most of them are unclear as to whether they have happened or not. What was very interesting is this nice slide on the assumptions used for their forecast. This is something we have been begging the council to ask for from the Finance Director for his projections. These forecast assumptions seem reasonable given circumstances (and they were made several months ago). There was also an additional slide talking about the need to take action NOW!

What was the point of hiring these consultants and getting their recommendations and projections and then ignoring them?

I also requested records to see what cuts were being put into the future budget projections. I was told that there were no records in regards to that. So we continue to not know things like if the furloughs were carried over into future budget years?


The city’s refusal to be transparent has been an issue since long before this crisis. The only way they will be transparent is if we the residents push them to do so. These questions are not brain surgery. The information is readily available from the City Manager. So why are they refusing to give that information out?


Again, please write your council members and tell them to get this information out there. Please remember that the longer it takes for an action to happen the more severe the actions are taken will be.

We are alarmed but refuse to take action-City Council meeting 10/20/2020

But they refuse to take action! Councilperson Pardue-Okimoto was once again the lone voice saying make cuts now. As you can see from the below statement included in the packet we are at 11% of revenues with 25% of the year completed. Now there is an issue with the city getting our Transfer Tax money from the county due to logistical issues so that will make up some of this deficit. However, what we are seeing month after month is overly optimistic revenue projections that have no basis in reality. During the meeting, the Finance Director said we had 9 months to make up 4 million in revenue from the Recreation Department. Does anyone think we will be able to make up some of the lost revenue losses in this fiscal year? He also stated he would amend if he heard from the Recreation Department that their revenue was down. Is that not a number that should be being passed on to the Finance Director monthly? The Recreation Department was formerly referred to by Councilperson Fadelli as El Cerrito’s cash cow. And this cow is no longer producing. We need massive adjustments to be made.

Apparently an over $844,000 revenue shortfall in one quarter is not enough to inspire the council to act. Mayor Lyman was alarmed. Councilperson Quinto was alarmed but both said lets keep on watching for another month or two. Because not acting on bad budget news is exactly how we got to this crisis in the first place.

I am at a loss here. Except for a few dogged individuals the public comment is quiet unless they try to cut something people love like the library or a swim center staff person. While the council has at least improved to the point that they are looking at monthly statements their refusal to act is a stunning betrayal of public trust.

I get the public numbing out. We want to live our lives and not be constantly worried about government on all of its levels. However, if the city goes bankrupt it will be a disaster. Every service that people love will be decimated. Services that are needed like Fire will also be cut. Look at what happened to Vallejo. They paid over 20 million in legal and other fees on their bankruptcy. They are struggling to this day, 8 years after emerging from bankruptcy, because of their pension debt which was not resolved in the bankruptcy. At the time they cut the library and senior services and 40% of the police budget. This is what El Cerrito faces without better fiscal management. The consultants hired by the city already have proposed closing Station 72 of the Fire Department something that is widely not supported. But at the end of the day we need both more revenue and expenditure cuts. We need a City Manager and Council willing to make substantive changes. All the changes thus far have not even touched the pension debt issue which is rarely even discussed.

If the City declares bankrupcty (which will happen if we cannot pay back our 8.6 million dollar loan in June 2021 we can anticipate all services to be cut or eliminated. We can perhaps even predict falling housing values like what happened in Vallejo.

What I can say is if you are concerned please write to your council memebers and also submit public comments at the meetings. Council members need to hear from residents. Every voice does matter. If it had not been for a bunch of people sending emails and pushing I doubt we would have seen much action at all. And if you have not voted for council yet please vote for the people you think will best be able to address this budget crisis.

Karen Pinkos-City Manager kpinkos@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Greg Lyman-Mayor glyman@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Paul Fadelli Vice Mayor pfadelli@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Councilperson Pardue-Okimoto rpardueokimoto@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Councilperson Janet Abelson jabelson@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Councilperson Gabe Quinto gquinto@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Election News Updates

The Election News page has been updated with the 2nd campaign filings for the candidates. The candidates will be meeting with Daniel Borenstein of the East Bay Times and I will post that when it comes out. It is a shame since many of us have voted already.

Most significant findings form the campaign finance reports.

Matt Burnham is heavily support by the police union for $3,000. He also has a large donation from a person called Paul Ought a software developer. No information was found on this person with a superficial google search.

Tessa Rudnick, Paul Fadelli, and Lisa Motoyama each have some substantial union donations many of them overlapping especially with Fadelli and Motoyama.

Tessa Rudnick got heavy support from two different firefighter unions the Berkeley Union and the Local 1230 Union.

Isis continues to self fund. William Ktanses and Art Yee do not have campaign committees so thus they do not have to file reports.

Jennifer Greel has a small amount of donations that are all small.

The City Staff continues to “monitor the deficit” as our revenue projections are way off.

The packet is out for the meeting on October 20, 2020. It is a shorter agenda with the financial reporting agenda item 7-A. The information for this item in the packet starts at page 42.

A quote from the section on Revenues. Bold is mine.

“The expectations for Charges for Services is  based on historical first quarter collections during 2017-2019 that have ranged from $1.3to $1.5million. The expectation for the current period was tied to the lower end of that scale due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Even with this lowered expectation it appears that revenues are $624,000 under budget at this point in time.”

Remember two posts ago when I said that the end of the year projection was a surplus of just $663,032. So no action here and we end with zero surplus. And surplus is a misleading word since we have an 8.5 million loan that any “surplus” would be used to pay off. The initial reports from the un-audited budget from 19/20 are that we ended that year with a 2.3 million deficit.

The summary quote states-bold is mine

“The Amended Budget anticipates a General Fund surplus of $662,000. The expenditure side of the budget is relatively certain, but there is uncertainty surrounding revenues, especially Charges for Services which is predominantly Recreation Department Revenues. The projected $2.3 million General Fund deficit from the last fiscal year will be partially mitigated by the projected surplus. It must be noted that one time revenues, government grants, or unforeseen increases in revenues will help reduce the deficit further. Staff will continue to monitor the deficit and report to City Council through the monthly reports.”

So even with a reports saying projections are off the city staff are insisting that all is well. We may still see some “unforeseen increase in revenue.”

How about we recognize we are

  1. Almost bankrupt
  2. In a recession
  3. Making projections based on years that are not 2020 with all of its complications.

If you look at the budget figures provided in the packet it seems that the projections for revenue are higher than 19/20. I would like to know why that is? How is the Finance Director making these projections and can we trust them given the history of El Cerrito financial projections?

So actions-please again write the council and send it an email for comment to the City Clerk for public comment at the meeting cityclerk@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us-the budget is item 7A on the agenda

Karen Pinkos-City Manager kpinkos@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Greg Lyman-Mayor glyman@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Paul Fadelli Vice Mayor pfadelli@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Councilperson Pardue-Okimoto rpardueokimoto@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Councilperson Janet Abelson jabelson@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Councilperson Gabe Quinto gquinto@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Suggested comments

  1. When will the council take action and make cuts commensurate with the seriousness of the situation?
  2. Please require the Finance Director to report on how he is making revenue assumptions with all the assumptions he is using listed.
  3. When does the council intend to deal with rising Cal-Pers costs and how?
  4. Please require that the Finance Director follow up on the questions the Mayor asked last time about financing charges being down so substantially.
  5. Please have council members state on the record why they are refusing to ask for more cuts (exception is Councilperson Pardue-Okimoto who has been asking)
  6. Please state clearly any revenue that is expected but has not been reported on. It seems that we keep hearing about one-time revenue sources but have not seen any specifics.

More of the same inaction from El Cerrito City Council on the budget-When is enough enough?

The El Cerrito City Council continues to refuse to take real action on the budget.

I will start this post by stating that Councilperson Rochelle Pardue-Okimoto was a superstar during the meeting and she would have taken action. I will also be honest and say that I did not watch the entire meeting. I did watch every section where I share quotes here. I tried to make quotes as close to verbatim as possible but that was not always possible and some statements were not included. I do not believe that changes the context but encourage you to go to the the video link and verify for yourselves. I have indicated the time of the quotes so that people can watch for themselves. 

I am going to outline several big issues.

  1. Minimization of the bond rating drop.

At 3:22 Karen minimized the bond drop because S&P stated the outlook was stable from negative. She stated that the TRAN rating is different and acted as if this rating would not affect our interest costs for the next TRAN. This is our credit rating. Karen said that S&P had been monitoring council meetings and she stated because the council made cuts we got a stable outlook. Then Karen said if the city borrowed more money it would cost the city more money. So, it is confusing that she says the TRAN rating is different because this does mean we will pay more interest. It was stated that it will impact any financing for any capital improvements.

2. Why is the city ignoring the massively rising costs of Cal-Pers?

You will see in the above chart Cal-Pers costs are broken out into normal cost which is the current costs and the unfunded liability, which is what is unfunded from years the city did not pay into the system (that is a long story and something many cities chose to do)

In the meeting at 2:33, Karen says that the projected amount of the unfunded liabilities is 4.8 million. 

At 2:45 in the video Councilperson, Pardue-Okimoto brought up that the city’s liability increased from $61.8 million to $88.2 million per year. That represents approximately $2 million per year in additional costs. She reminded people that it is something that we should be preparing for now.

Karen responded with a statement about advocating with the state and monitoring costs but nothing about how this giant increase in costs would be paid for.  Remember it has taken us almost a year to get to the current 4 million in cuts done during this process.

3. Mark Rasiah’s incompetence. 

At 3:28 Mayor Lyman started questioning the Finance Director about financing costs. The Mayor was pointing out that the documents showed a savings of almost a million dollars in that line item and asked the Finance Director several times in several different ways if it was a real savings. Mark insisted that there was a real savings but that some of it was a cut in professional services costs. It is a very painful piece to listen to. The Mayor pointed out that if there was a 1 million dollar savings it should have been heralded and it should have also shown up in the bottom line neither of which happened. 

4. Councilperson Rochelle Pardue-Okimoto was a superstar

3:48 Councilperson Rochelle Pardue-Okimoto starts talking-this is not her complete statement but most highlights.

I do not think we are building our reserves as quickly as possible. It is up to the city council to make the hard decisions.

She brought up police department positions-bringing up the two positions were eliminated by the school board but not the council and the other position was already vacant

We stated we should show our values by our funding. She wants to protect the library and suggested putting it under the police department budget. She asked what will be the trigger for change? What if retirements do not happen? 

Another thing I brought up but did not get much support for is looking at our salaries…. Clearly shooting for the median is not working for us. I couldn’t help but think who hires and pays our consultants? Of course, the consultants are not going to say to the people who hire us and pay us, we think you should cut your own salaries. I personally do not like how we are comparing our salaries to big cities. I think we should compare our salaries to small cities. If we do not cut salaries, then we need to extend the furloughs in order to stay afloat. We need to do something now, and I do not think this budget does that.

We need to budget for disaster. We need to prepare for that now. We need to prepare today for the disaster that can happen tomorrow. 

The weight of the Financial Advisory Board does not carry the weight with me anymore because they approved the previous budget that helped us land in this position. I was listening in at FAB and someone asked the city manager why the city is waiting until January to do these layoffs and the city manager replied because the city council thought that would be best. I remember thinking I don’t remember being asked about that. It is all semantics. They present us with something and we vote YES and then it comes back that it was our decision. Where does it really come from? 

3:55 If I had to make these cuts, I would have made them a lot sooner. At the end of the day, the residents are looking to the city council to make these cuts. I depended on the advice of the FAB in the past at the end of the day it is us that the residents expect to make these decisions. I don’t want to look back on this and have more regrets. I will be voting NO on this budget.

#5 More of the same from other council members

Councilperson Quinto keeps saying he was deceived and that big austerity cuts need to happen but says he will vote yes on the budget. Councilperson Paul Fadelli says let’s pass this to show we are doing something (4:03). Let’s pass the buck to the state auditor. 

Councilperson Quinto at 3:57

 I am going to support this budget. It changes every day and will continue to do so. We need to look at it monthly and we will have to make more cuts and it is all about austerity. The independent auditor was telling the truth. We need checks and balances. We have not been getting this for the last 15 years, we have had the same progressive council that agrees on everything. We cannot do that anymore. We have a city manager now that tells it like it is and doesn’t give a rosy picture. We’ve done three taxes since I’ve been an elected official in six years. We are still spending, spending, spending, and we need more cuts. I look forward to the new council that will help me make these cuts. This is going to be a painful next three years. We just did the wrong thing, and it is nobody’s fault. What I learned is to not listen to your colleagues. They have their own agendas and are lying.

Councilperson Quinto attacks his colleagues for lying to him and stated that the newspapers were right years ago when they said the city was not prepared but he chose not to believe them.

It is very confusing to this writer that he talks about the need to not have unanimous votes and how he wants a NEW council to help him make cuts since this council won’t do it. But he is going to vote for the terrible budget anyway instead of showing the courage of Councilperson Pardue-Okimoto

Councilperson Abelson moved at 4:16 to pass the budget and Councilperson Quinto seconded it and it was passed 4-1 with Councilperson Pardue-Okimoto being the one no vote. 

The numbers don’t work-El Cerrito Proposed Budget 20/21

I just reviewed the 419-page packet for the City Council meeting on October 6, 2020.
I have many questions because the numbers are just not matching. The document starts on page 140 of the packet. In her memo (page 141), Karen Pinkos says the following-(Bold is added by me)

“With these adjustments staff is proposing a General Fund Budget of $39.3 million in revenues and $38.7 million in expenses for FY 2020-21. This represents a $3.4 million (or 8%) reduction in revenues and $3.9 million (or 9%) reduction in expenditures over the baseline budget.”

She later says (page 142)

“With all funds combined, the proposed FY 2020-21 budget recommends total expenditures of $53,078,141 and provides funding for all City services, including Police, Fire, Recreation, Community Development, Public Works, and City Management. At this time, total revenues are projected to be $52,837,251; these funds will continue to be monitored and updated as the COVID-19 is expected to have impacts on several funds including Gas Tax, Measure J Return to Source, SB-1, Street Improvement Fund, and Measure J Paratransit. For FY 2020-21, staff is proposing a General Fund budget with revenues of $39,377,869 and expenditures amounting to $38,714,837, resulting in a surplus of $663,032.”

Later in the budget (page 182) they say

“While the City’s General Fund revenue sources are fairly diverse, there is a reliance on elastic revenue sources to provide fiscal sustainability for the City. Before the pandemic, the largest revenue source, Property Tax, comprised about 26% of total General Fund revenues. There is the potential for Proposition 8 assessment appeals under a prolonged recession scenario that may impact property tax revenues by 2% in FY 2021-22. Sales tax revenues totaled 18% of General Fund revenues before the recession. The City experienced about a 10% decline in sales tax in FY 2019-20 and is expecting an additional decline of approximately 13% in FY 2020-21. It is expected that sales tax revenues will not recover fully until FY 2023-24.”

The city took out an 8.5 million dollar loan this year to stay afloat. They desire to have a 17% reserve. They are saying sales tax revenue will be lower as will the gas tax and potentially property taxes but they are planning on ending with only a $663,032 surplus. Which if it occurred would get next year’s loan down to 8 million dollars. In City Council meetings they keep saying they will have it paid down in 3 years. At 500k a year it will take 17 years to get the loan paid off. You can’t build a reserve until you pay off the loan. So maybe 25 years to get us on track? This 600+k gives us very little wiggle room in a time of economic crisis. The idea of an 8% reduction when we are on the verge of bankruptcy is shocking. A 20% reduction seems more in line with the level of crisis we are in.

On page 183 they paint a where the numbers do not work.

“Budget Strategies To address the fiscal gap in this recessionary environment and to restore General Fund reserves to the minimum recommended reserve goal of two months (17%) of annual operating expenditures, the City is implementing budget strategies of $1.5 million in annual budget savings. These reductions are beyond the actions the City included within the preliminary FY 2020-21 budget. This action will restore General Fund reserves above zero by FY 2022-23 and to the minimum recommended reserve goal of 17% by FY 2025-26, as shown in Charts 2-5 and 2-6.”

Remember before we can build a reserve we have to totally pay off the TRAN loans. The reason we get these loans is because we have no reserves.

The information on the Fire Department was also confusing. They have said they will fill three open positions on page 233.

“For the first time in over a decade, the Fire Department will be fully staffed operationally beginning in January 2021. The Department will not rely on overtime from the three unfilled authorized “coverage” positions as in years past, resulting in approximately $400,000 savings in overtime costs. Fire Department overtime (non-OES), which has exceeded a million dollars in each of the past three years, is budgeted at $500,000 and will be contained at this level once the three vacant positions are filled.”

However, if you look at the following chart overall personnel costs are up 500k. So where is the savings? Where was the line item for OT if it was not in personnel? Are we saving money in the FD or spending more?


Regarding the police department, the only positions cut were an administrative position and the two school resource positions. Those were cut by the school district which had paid for one of them. It seems that any future cuts (based also on what the Chief said at the last meeting) are aspirational. They are waiting for retirements and then will cut positions. They are not making cuts now.

Page 242 states

“Position Listing-The total authorized positions for the Police Department includes 55 full-time positions, including 43 sworn officers. The decrease in this fiscal year reflects the elimination of the (2) School Resource Officer (SRO) positions and one (1) Management Analyst position. The department intends to hold a number of positions vacant in FY 2020-21 to achieve expenditure targets: the full-time positions are four (4) Police Officers and one (1) Senior Records Specialist, and two (2) Part-Time Community Services Officers (CSO). If other vacancies develop, these may also remain unfilled to achieve a staffing goal of 37 sworn officers.”

Once again the staff and council are not taking aggressive enough actions. Last meeting Council members Pardue-Okimoto and Quinto both pushed for more cuts but NO ACTION was taken. I beg those council members to push harder next meeting and hopefully, a third council member will have the guts to agree. This budget should not be approved without an additional 10% in cuts. The police department seems to have some low hanging fruit. The administrative staff is only committed to furloughs through the end of the calendar year so that would save 300k more if extended through the FY. We should be aiming for a surplus more in the 2 million range so we have room for emergencies and we can take a big piece out of the TRAN for next year. Because remember our bond rating dropped and that loan (if we get it) will cost the city even more than the 100+K it cost this year.

I urge readers to email in public comment and/or write the council members about this crisis.

City Clerk for public comment at the meeting cityclerk@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us-the budget is item 7A on the agenda

Karen Pinkos-City Manager kpinkos@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Greg Lyman-Mayor glyman@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Paul Fadelli Vice Mayor pfadelli@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Councilperson Pardue-Okimoto rpardueokimoto@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Councilperson Janet Abelson jabelson@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Councilperson Gabe Quinto gquinto@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Tessa Rudnick’s campaign finance report

I did a prior post on the other candidates campaign finance reports found here. Tessa Rudnick’s report got filed late so that it is the reason it is getting it’s own post. I will say she did reach out to the author and acknowledge that she had missed the deadline and she took responsibility and got it in. I personally appreciate public officials (or those trying to be public officials acknowledging mistakes. How refreshing! Her report is found here for those that want to dig in.

So what stands out? She has raised quite a bit of money-just under $12k. To this date she has spent just under 5k. She has donated just under 2k to her own campaign. Her main expenses seem to be a campaign consultant and a polling place. She is not showing donations from her campaign to others except the Democratic Party of Contra Costa County. Her donations appear to come from individuals with a fair amount of family members also contributing.

El Cerrito City Council Candidate Financial Reports Released

The first filing date for campaign contribution reports was September 24, 2020. Items had to be postmarked by that date so there may still be some additions. Two candidates have not created Campaign Committees so therefore do not need to file.

A few things stand out

  1. The former City Manager Scott Hanin, a person many believe was fundamental to the current financial crisis, donated to Matt Burnham.
  2. Lisa Motoyama is heavily supported by past candidate Margaret Kavanaugh-Lynch and current mayor Greg Lyman.
  3. Paul Fadelli has many donations from local politicians. He has loaned over 23k to his campaign and has over $16,000 cash on hand so one wonders why the loans. Compared to his last filing this time he has not time accepted money from SEIU or the unions for the Fire and Police Departments.

We will continue to check to see if Jennifer Greel and Tessa Rudnick file for this period.

Matt Burnham reports $1,650 contributed to his campaign. Notable contributions include Former City Manager Scott Hanin who gave $100. Leslie Reckler, candidate for School Board, gave $100. Jenny Keith, whom we suspect is married to Police Chief Paul Keith, gave $500. He reports not spending any money yet.

Jennifer Greel nothing filed yet

Lisa Motoyama She has received $4,874.14 in contributions. Notable contributions include $600 from Greg Lyman for City Council 2016. $1,097.14 from Margaret Kavanaugh-Lynch for City Council 2020. $250 from former El Cerrito City Councilperson and current attorney Letitia Moore. She has spent $3,456.70 + 804.90 in outstanding bills for a total of 4311.60. Payments were made to El Cerrito for $440 for the filing fees. $54 to Democratic Party of Contra Costa County for what is listed as civic donations. $420.94 to the Democratic Party of Contra Costa County for literature. There were also payments for graphics and website.

Paul Fadelli He has by far the largest amount of contributions with $8944 this reporting period and $11,470 the calendar year. In the calendar year column it also shows a $23,000 loan. When that is looked at more it is all money he loaned to his campaign over the last 4 years. He has spent $2,417.89 this reporting period and $4,363.53 YTD.

He received $100 From Gabriel Quinto for City Council 2018, $150 from Janet Abelson for City Council 2018, $200 from former councilperson Letitia Moore, $100 directly from Councilperson Pardue-Okimoto, and $100 from former Councilperson Sandi Potter

Paul Fadelli’s expenditures include donations to other candidates like Eric Salwell and some of the same Democratic donations that Lisa Motoyama made. When you look back at his last filing he has not this time accepted money from SEIU or the unions for the Fire and Police Departments.

Isis has had $1125 of contributions all but $100 of which were made by her. Her expenditures were $814 and most seem related to her website.

Arthur Yee No Campaign Committee Formed so no filing was needed

William Ktsanes No Campaign Committee Formed so no filing was needed

Tessa Rudnick nothing filed yet. Update September 30th I was informed by the candidate that they made a mistake with the filing date and they will file today. I will update as soon as the information is available.

City Council-Will You Act Now? Bond ratings drop again

On September 24th El Cerrito’s bond ratings once again dropped. The Sales Tax Revenue bond rating dropped to BBB+ and the CA COP rating dropped to a BBB-. Google what BBB- means and you see that it is one step above junk bond.

Yesterday I posted a blog post about how at the last meeting there was an unwillingness to act on further cuts even though they were suggested by Councilperson Pardue-Okimoto at least twice during the meeting.

We just got an 8.5 million dollar TRAN loan a few months ago. Our normal bank did not take the loan so it went to the open market and ended up costing the city considerably more in interest. The reason that happened is because of a prior bond rating drop in November 2019 from A to BBB. With this new drop, it appears that the risk of not getting a TRAN loan for next year has also dropped. At a minimum, the cost of getting the loan has risen again.

The article on the drop to BBB- states

El Cerrito, CA COP Rating Lowered To ‘BBB-‘ On Negative General Fund Reserves And Reduced Expenditure Flexibility

SAN FRANCISCO (S&P Global Ratings) Sept. 24, 2020–S&P Global Ratings lowered its underlying rating (SPUR) to ‘BBB-‘ from ‘BBB’ on El Cerrito, Calif.’s certificates of participation (COPs) outstanding. The outlook is stable. 

“The lowered rating reflects our view of the weaker economic and financial circumstances under which the city is attempting to stabilize its budget and restore reserves,” said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Tim Tung.

The COVID-19 pandemic and related recessionary pressures have further strained the city’s revenues, yielding an operating deficit for fiscal 2020 and pushing available fund balance further into negative levels based on unaudited actual results for fiscal 2020 provided by management. The city’s fiscal 2019 audit marks the third consecutive year in which the audit was transmitted with a “going concern” opinion by the auditor, which reflects the auditor’s concern about the city’s ability to meet required operating obligations, and we anticipate that this trend will continue for a fourth year when the fiscal 2020 audit is produced. The outlook is stable based on our view that the city’s corrective actions during the past year are adequate to at least maintain credit quality at the current rating level.

El Cerrito’s credit quality is currently driven by the city’s negative general fund reserve position. Although the city has been in the process of realigning the budget with a focus on restoring reserves, it now faces recessionary pressures that present diminished growth prospects as compared to last year, when the economy was in the late stages of an economic growth cycle. Also, based on unaudited actual results for fiscal 2020, we understand that the general fund produced a negative $2.3 million net result, which worsens the existing negative available fund balance and further sets the city back from its targeted reserve goals. 

While we acknowledge that the city has taken aggressive action during the past year to set in motion plans to achieve structural balance and restore reserves–including a rapid adjustment once the COVID-19 pandemic and economic recession injected additional complications–the expenditure cuts that the city has made and will be making further reduce its expenditure flexibility if needed in the future,” Mr. Tung added. “Given the expenditure reductions already made, any substantial additional expenditure reductions will likely require layoffs, which would likely be politically challenging. Finally, while the adjusted trajectory to restoring reserves still achieves the city’s stated goals, that trajectory is now starting from a lower point, is on a steeper incline than before, and reaches the goal at a later projected date.

Despite these challenges, we still view the city’s liquidity as very strong. We also note that the city’s otherwise robust tax base and close proximity to the San Francisco economy is limiting the downside effects of its current fiscal situation.”

The article dropping the sales tax bond rating to BBB+ states

El Cerrito, CA Sales Tax Revenue Bond Rating Lowered To ‘BBB+’ On Weakened Obligor Creditworthiness

SAN FRANCISCO (S&P Global Ratings) Sept. 24, 2020–S&P Global Ratings lowered its long-term rating to ‘BBB+’ from ‘A-‘ on El Cerrito Public Financing Authority, Calif.’s sales tax revenue bonds, issued on behalf of the City of El Cerrito. The outlook is stable.

“The downgrade reflects our view of the obligor’s creditworthiness weakening,” said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Tim Tung. For more information on our view of the city’s overall creditworthiness, see our article published Sept. 24, 2020, on RatingsDirect.

The city benefits from a strong and stable local economy, as evidenced by continued assessed value growth, and its location within the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, Calif., metropolitan statistical area. However, the city’s general fund has experienced financial challenges during recent years resulting in weakening reserve levels, and leading to weaker creditworthiness, in our view, which limits the rating on these sales tax bonds.

Although sales tax revenue declined sharply in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 as the COVID-19 pandemic and related shelter-in-place activities constrained economic activity, we have observed some rebound in recent months although not to prerecession levels. While pledged revenue has experienced some volatility in recent years, coverage has remained strong. We anticipate at least stable performance in the near term, supported by an established sales tax base.“

So is another bond rating enough to act? One suggestion in the meeting was low hanging fruit. The non-management (non-public safety) staff are only furloughed through the end of the calendar year not the fiscal year. That is something that can be addressed quickly even if the benefits do not come into play until Jan 1st. It should have been already done.

The Public Safety budget is 50% of the budget and needs further evaluation. We can’t cut fire safety for obvious reasons so it is time to look at the ECPD. Chief Keith has previously stated that they are responding to fewer calls. He also stated that burglaries are down most likely due to so many more people being home. If you look at the weekly crime reports there are more and more days with no calls at all. Whether or not you support any change in police funding for racial and social justice reasons it is certainly worth looking at whether or not the largest piece of the pie is taking its fair share of the cuts. El Cerrito Progressives has reported 

The ECPD will now take  31.2% of our city budget, and the proposed “restructuring” will take place over three years and still not address our concerns and demands to reimagine policing. , As Chief Keith explained, the savings they hoped (his word) would affect the ECPD budget were based on attrition, in other words, if an officer decides to leave the agency or retire the savings would kick in. These are aspirational reductions, and certainly do not affect the budget in a real way or address the concerns of so many residents. ”

The City Council and staff are continuing to move very slowly and not make significant enough cuts. As I reported in the last post we are projected to be only a few hundred thousand above what we need to pay the TRAN loan in June 2021. There is no way we move towards reducing the TRAN when we are still at risk of not being able to pay it at all. We ended FY 19/20 with an estimated 2.3 million dollar deficit because Council and staff were so slow to respond. El Cerrito was warned they were in trouble. Their own auditor brought up concerns in November of 2018 that they disregarded. Then they were told early in the 2nd quarter of FY 19/20 that the State Auditor (October 2019) considered the city at high risk of bankruptcy but action was delayed for months until the problem was compounded by the COVID 19 crisis.

We have been asking the City to act since the State Auditors report was issued. We beg them to act now.

Budget Update

On September 15th City Council met and discussed two items in regards to the budget. The meeting was over 4.5 hours and it is not a reasonable expectation that most people will listen to it all. I will confess I listened to 2+ hours only.

The first item was regarding the Finance Department’s monthly reports. This starts on page 121 in the packet. I give kudos to Councilperson Abelson for first pushing for this report to exist and secondly for pushing during this meeting to make the report functional and transparent. Councilperson Pardue-Okimoto also questioned this report. What is missing is is a clear explanation of what percentage of income is coming in each month as compared to past years. We know property taxes primarily come in during two specific months but we need to be closely monitoring sales tax as we can expect that to be severely impacted due to the recession. From the chart below it does seem that we are behind projections. Sales tax does come in a month later than collected and the finance director gave several confusing explanations as to whether this report was helpful or not. The utility tax also comes in as less than proposed.

One of the MOST important reports is found on page 125 of this report. You will see as currently projected we have an 8.9 million dollar amount left at the end of June 2021. However, we have 8.75 million dollars due to the TRAN loan. This is an unacceptably close margin. I will give both Council members Pardue-Okimoto and Quinto credit for both suggesting more severe cuts now. However, it seems that if a councilperson other than the Mayor suggests this nothing happens. This is frustrating to watch. As stated above we do not have accurate information on how our sales tax revenue is doing compared to last year based on the chart included it looks lower than projected. At one point will the Council and Staff act or will there have to be another crisis. If we do not have the money to pay the TRAN the city goes bankrupt. The Finance Director did say that 8.9 million did not include a 300k CARES fund expected and what seems to be an increase in the transfer tax. Again we are requesting a higher level of transparency. How close to the edge are we and at what point will the council and staff act?

In response to some questions the City Manager stated she would make further cuts if directed by three members of the council. So which three members are going to step up and demand that? There was greater feedback from the council on how the assumptions were made and if they were accurate and that they expected monthly updates. Councilperson Pardue-Okimoto brought up the idea of extending non-management furloughs beyond end of the calendar year and the Mayor stated he wanted to wait another month or two before taking action. He wants “ready solutions” if things continue to worsen. This is an action item-the budget will be on the agenda each meeting and we need to tell the Council to start making additional cuts.

There was some talk of the TRAN as a result of public comment. Some council members seem to be optimistically saying we will be TRAN free in 3 years. With an almost 9 million loan it seems to me that we would have to be cutting an additional 3 million dollars a year for the next three years on top of cutting for any revenue shortages to be even close to get rid of the TRAN loan. It looks like a bit of magical thinking to get to the places that council is saying when we are only a few hundred thousand ahead of just paying the loan off this year.

There was some dialogue on the hiring of new fire department staff members. They are saying this will cut OT costs the next few years. Councilperson Abelson pointed out that this is a short term solution as personnel costs grow over time. Staff stated there were changes in the retirement law make new hires cheaper than in the past which is why these hires were not made previously. However, the numbers that they were either looking at or talking about it the meeting were not accessible to the public so I still cannot ascertain what data is used. Please ask the council to release this data in the next packet.

The Finance Director also stated the CAFR should be out in December and he is currently predicting as a worse case scenario a deficit of 2.3 million for the year that ended June 30th.

I plead with Council and staff to make information accessible more easily and to TAKE ACTION NOW! I hope that readers of this will email their council members to ask what it will take to make cuts. Email address for council can be found here.

El Cerrito Progressives also wrote a post on the budget meeting. Check it out for their perspective.

New Proposed Budget Book is out

The City Council has its next meeting on September 15, 2020, at 7 pm. Here is the link to the e-packet-the budget information starts on page 121.

This is a lot of information to digest. The City continues to not disseminate this information in a manner that is accessible to a resident that does not have an accounting degree.

A few things called out to me-The figure below is the operating expenses. To me, it doesn’t look like substantial cuts have been made. There are increases in supplies and a large increase in professional services. We have spent months hearing about cuts that are proposed but I am not seeing them below.

From the proposed 20/21 budget book

From the 16/17-18/19 budget book

If we look at these two charts we see that we are being told the Police are taking some big cuts but the percentage-wise that is not changing and the percentage of the budget the police is has increased. It also shows the Fire Department budget as a percentage of the budget has increased dramatically. We are watching our state burn so We all want an adequately funded Fire Department but one of the issues raised by the State Auditor was whether El Cerrito could afford to keep their fire department levels. I think it would help if the city could be more transparent as to why the percentage has risen so much. Is it the cost of living in a state filled with fires or are there ways to make strategic cuts? Data is the only way to know. Perhaps El Cerrito needs to look at other sources of funding for the fire department. OES grants for disaster preparedness would be a great start.
Many recommendations have been discussed at the last few meetings but the lack of specificity still is alarming. What are the changes to the Fire Department and Police Department specifically? What administrative positions have been cut. We need more details on the 1.5 million in proposed cuts that they have been discussing in the last few meetings.

Please keep sending in your comments to the city clerk and or the council members. A budget has not yet been adopted and we need to continue to push for transparency and accountability.

Contra Costa Measure X

There are other things on the ballot El Cerrito residents need to pay attention to. Contra Costa County is trying to pass a .5% sales tax increase. El Cerrito currently has a sales tax of 9.75% so this would make our city sales tax 10.25% at a time when our economic development is very poor and our businesses are suffering. In general, sales taxes are considered regressive because they impact lower-income families at a much more substantial rate than higher-income families.

This sales tax is not earmarked and will used to increase the general fund. So while I have heard proponents of this tax claim it will increase services for the unhoused and for mental health services there is no evidence that will happen. We have just seen the County Supervisors approve 25 new Sheriff’s officer position and money to improve the Martinez jail. In a time of a de-fund, the police movement it seems a different solution might be to use some of that money to fund social workers to deal with the mental health issues that the Sheriff’s officers are not trained to deal with. in the Mercury Times article linked to below Supervisors were claiming they had to fund these positions to improve mental health conditions. Some of the initial funding comes from federal funds but after the first six months, the county taxpayers will pay for those positions. The one mental health position is at a cost of almost $300,000.

We are in a very tough economic time right now and the County will also need more financial resources. The question to ask yourself is that is a sales tax the best way to fund the county and do you trust the county to use additional monies for the issues/services that you deem most important?

References

25 new Contra Costa Sheriff’s Office jobs OK’d over opposition-Mecury Times-August 12, 2020

Measure X Text

Contra Costa County Recommended Budget 20/21

Tessa Rudnick answers the budget questions

As I wrote recently ECCFRG asked all of the candidates a series of questions in regards to the budget crisis. Tessa Rudnick sent in her responses Tuesday. We did allow each candidate a brief bio space also. The words below are all the candidate’s except for when I repeat the question. We thank Tessa Runnick for taking the time to answer our questions.

Brief Bio

I care about smart government and sustainable communities. I’m a Public Sector Technologist with more than a decade of experience working as a Project Manager and Business Analyst, implementing software solutions for local governments. I have worked for the City of Berkeley and the City and County of San Francisco. I’m a proud Bay Area native and hold a Masters degree in Public Administration. I’m also a mother with a nearly 5-year-old daughter and a 13-year-old stepson. To me, smart government means being responsive and agile to support the needs of our community. I believe in El Cerrito’s future, which is why I am ready and willing to make the tough decisions needed to get us there.

1. What is your analysis of how the city became insolvent and what changes will you make to ensure it does not happen again?

It’s a case of, “The road to hell is paved with good intentions.” During the recovery period from the 2008 recession, El Cerrito chose to dip into its reserve funds instead of eliminating full-time employees (FTE’s). Many neighboring jurisdictions actively chose to eliminate FTE positions in favor of dipping into reserves. The City tried to do right by its employees and the community. However we are now in the situation we are in because we missed some fundamental principles of public sector finance.

If El Cerrito was a person, she’d be living paycheck-to-paycheck, she’d have no savings, and she’d be a medical emergency away from total financial ruin. We have to take this situation seriously, and make the hard decisions needed for a few years. Which using the person analogy, means cutting up our credit cards and eating top ramen noodles in order to build up our savings.

2. How will you independently verify staff budget projections and analysis?

My motivation to run for El Cerrito City Council is to be that independent verification required by the community. Staff projections and analysis are only as good as the data they have access to, so I will make sure that city staff are: a) Using the right analytical techniques b) Have access to the correct datasets c) Are able to produce reports which are informative and accessible to Council and the community.

I have no problem asking targeted questions about line items on the budget and looking deeper into the data. Council should have the competencies to understand how government works, and working in local government has allowed me the opportunity to understand the in’s and out’s of critical reporting.

3. Describe what you understand to be the working relationship between the City Manager and the City Council. Are there any changes you would like to see in the current culture, and if so, how would you go about it?

I have worked in local government as city staff for a decade, and have a strong sense of the City Council/City Manager framework. The City Manager is responsible for the operations of city management, and the City Council represents the constituents who have elected the members of Council. Council sets the policy direction for the City, and the City Manager reports to Council. The culture of local government is constantly shifting and adapting to changes, and it’s up to the City Manager to ensure a healthy and inclusive culture for city staff.

4. How will you evaluate the city manager’s performance and hold them accountable?

El Cerrito is lucky to have a City Manager who is widely regarded and respected in the public administration field. We will evaluate the CM’s performance based on agreed upon goals and a framework for success. The most critical thing our City Manager needs to address is our dire financial situation, and we cannot be blindsided by any unaccounted for expenditures. Our City Manager must manage in crisis mode for the next few years until our financial situation is better, which to me means a reserve account with $6M and a better bond rating.

5. What role do you you think short-term borrowing has in the budget? If there is no role then what is your plan to eliminate it? If there is a role then what do you see as the impact on the city’s bond rating, borrowing costs and our ability to finance other capital projects?

Short-term borrowing unfortunately has been a pattern in El Cerrito for the past few years to stay afloat. We may need to borrow again to get us through this year, but I believe drastic cuts to all of our department budgets will set us up to avoid unnecessary borrowing. We should focus on attracting and retaining our small businesses, so we can begin to increase our tax base. If we do not increase the City’s bond rating, we will not be able to take on the community projects the majority of us in the community want, such as a new El Cerrito Public Library.

6. What are the details of your plan for El Cerrito getting out of the financial situation we are in?

We must operate under lean principles and the principles of ethical public sector finance. We can no longer accept the “shoulder shrug” with empty explanations of why we need to spend money which we did not account for… We must say “NO.” Often and frequently. Similar to the concept of wearing a mask and keeping your distance is how we show our love and respect for another, saying “NO” to expanding programs is how we will show our love and respect for the community. We have to become financially solvent and establish a reserve if we’re going to make our community stronger and have the ability to fund forward-thinking capital improvement projects. I imagine these next few years on Council will be tough, which is exactly why I want the job.

We have to build more affordable housing, we must attract and retain high-quality businesses, we must keep our community disaster-resilient, and we have to invest in our own community through our actions. Shop locally, use public transportation, and bicycle. If we focus on “winning on the basics,” we can create the type of community we are all proud to call home.

7. What do you see as the issue behind the over 1 million dollar amount of overtime for the Fire Department? How would you resolve this issue and keep El Cerrito fire safe.

In order to keep the community safe and maintain minimum staffing, overtime is a necessary evil. Minimum staffing ensures that ECFD has the capacities to respond during our neighbors deepest time of need. I believe we can use data to better understand our call types and call volumes and adjust staffing based on this data. Do we need to send an engine for every “lift assist?” Let’s use CAD data to better understand our Department, and tailor our responses better to our community needs. Overtime is ultimately less expensive than adding more FTE’s, and maintaining minimum staffing is critical for keeping all of us safe.

In order to keep El Cerrito fire safe, beyond maintaining minimum staffing, we must look to the State and our regional partners in order to expand our Emergency Preparedness capacities. We cannot afford to do it on our own. Disaster response is both a municipal and community effort, and we need the support of our El Cerrito Public Safety professionals.

8. What changes would you make with the police budget?

The police budget, along with other department budgets, has been reduced and will continue to be reduced. The most important thing we can do as a small city is ensure public safety. Which means safety for all stakeholders: housing insecure, low-income, communities of color, women, business owners, new families, and families that have been here for generations.

I most recently worked for the San Francisco Department of Police Accountability, an independent civilian-oversight law enforcement agency. I implemented a web-based tool for community members to file a complaint independently of the SF Police Department, and learned a great deal about 21st century policing models in the process.

The El Cerrito Police Department has been an innovator in community-service based law enforcement, and we can continue to innovate while operating on lean principles. We must look to our 911 data, daylight any inequities, make data-driven decisions, and work collaboratively to keep El Cerrito safe. Officers in El Cerrito receive extensive bias training in addition to their typical police officer training, and officers have an extended probationary period so we can make sure we’re retaining only high-quality officers.

Our country is facing a much-needed reckoning around local law enforcement. The Black Lives Matter movement is beautiful, and its principles belong here in El Cerrito. We should end qualified immunity nationally, we should reevaluate POBRA protections, but we also cannot carelessly reduce our public safety budget. We must approach public safety budgets with a surgeon’s knife instead of a hammer.

Arthur Yee responds to the budget questions

As I wrote recently ECCFRG asked all of the candidates a series of questions in regards to the budget crisis. Art Yee sent in his response yesterday. We did allow each candidate a brief bio space also. The words below are all the candidate’s except for when I repeat the question. We thank Art Yee for taking the time to answer our questions.

Brief Bio

There was no response submitted to this question.

1. What is your analysis of how the city became insolvent and what changes will you make to ensure it does not happen again?

It’s very simple spend what we can afford. No borrowing to offer services. EL Cerrito is small town of 26,000 people. We are not Berkeley, Oakland, Richmond or San Francisco. City spending need to correspond with population size.

2. How will you independently verify staff budget projections and analysis?

I am no expert. We need to hire an outside consultant that understands comparing cities are have similar population size and revenue.

3. Describe what you understand to be the working relationship between the City Manager and the City Council. Are there any changes you would like to see in the current culture, and if so, how would you go about it?

City Manager reports to the City Council. Council members needs be better informed to make better decisions on budget/revenue and city policies. Council members can’t just agree and follow the orders of the city manger. Council members do need be accountable.

4. How will you evaluate the city manager’s performance and hold them accountable?

I believe if the city manager performance is poor that says a lot about the city council members accountability. We all serve for the best interest of the community.

5. What role do you you think short-term borrowing has in the budget? If there is no role then what is your plan to eliminate it? If there is a role then what do you see as the impact on the city’s bond rating, borrowing costs and our ability to finance other capital projects?

I think borrowing is wrong. We need to spend what we have and only pay for we can afford them.

6. What are the details of your plan for El Cerrito getting out of the financial situation we are in?

I suggest we expand building and planning department. Make it easier to build and reduce permits fees and business license fees. That brings in revenue and jobs to our city. Reduce budget/city government and ask the community to help. Shop El Cerrito First! Ask community to volunteer to clean parks and etc.

7. What do you see as the issue behind the over 1 million dollar amount of overtime for the Fire Department? How would you resolve this issue and keep El Cerrito fire safe.

We need to ask the community to volunteer to make up some that overtime hours. Maybe clean or shop for the fire department. Or make even a volunteer fire department force.

8. What changes would you make with the police budget?

We need to reduce our officers… maybe 2 positions and redirect them to social workers.

Do only 2 of the City Council Candidates care about the budget?

A few weeks ago we sent emails to all of the candidates for the El Cerrito City Council and asked them the following questions.

  1. What is your analysis of how the city became insolvent and what changes will you make to ensure it does not happen again?
  2. How will you independently verify staff budget projections and analysis?
  3. Describe what you understand to be the working relationship between the City Manager and the City Council. Are there any changes you would like to see in the current culture, and if so, how would you go about it?
  4. How will you evaluate the city manager’s performance and hold them accountable?
  5. What role do you think short-term borrowing has in the budget?-Follow up: If there is no role: what is your plan to eliminate it. If there is a role then: what is the impact on the city’s Rating, borrowing costs, and our ability to finance other capital projects.
  6. What are the details of your plan for El Cerrito getting out of the financial situation we are in?
  7. What do you see as the issue behind the over 1 million overtime for the Fire Department each year? How would you resolve this issue and keep El Cerrito fire safe?
  8. What changes would you make with the police budget?

With the budget being the #1 issue in the city right now we wanted to know what each candidate thought about these questions. We set a deadline of August 31st to submit the answers which gave candidates a few weeks to think about and research the issues. As of today September 1st, we only received replies from Mayor Pro-Tem Paul Fadelli and candidate Jennifer Greel. We appreciate them taking the time to answer the questions.

September 1st Edit-Art Yee just sent in his response which will be published Wednesday. Tessa Rudnick also just sent in her response which will be published on Thursday.

It is troubling that none of the other candidates have responded. We sent both an initial email and a reminder email to them. Since many in the community have been frustrated with the lack of responsiveness from city staff and the current council it does not bode well that these candidates are not answering questions from El Cerrito residents. Do they not care what the community concerns are?

In the spirit of helping (and because whether they know this information or not three of them will make up the majority of our next council), we are offering an informational Zoom meeting with any candidate that wishes to hear from us. Candidates can listen to the perspective of citizens that care about these issues and have been working on them for well over a year. Candidates can email us at eccfrg@gmail.com to set up a meeting. These meetings will not be recorded and are an opportunity for a dialogue.

We are also committing to posting additional responses if we get them. It is very important that residents have adequate information to make their choices.

Below are the candidates that did not submit their answers and links to their candidate packets on the city website. I am going to ask our residents that care about the budget to contact these candidates and ask them to respond to our questions. If they don’t want them posted here then they can post them elsewhere. El Cerrito residents need to know that these candidates understand the budget situation, its severity, and how we got to this point

Isis

Art Yee

Tessa Rudnick

Lisa Motoyama

William Ktanes

Matthew Burnham

The packets for the candidates that shared their answers are below

Paul Fadelli

Jennifer Greel

Jennifer Greel answers the budget questions

As I wrote recently ECCFRG asked all of the candidates a series of questions in regards to the budget crisis. Jennifer Greel sent in her response today. We did allow each candidate a brief bio space also. The words below are all the candidate’s except for when I repeat the question. We thank Jennifer Greel for taking the time to answer our questions.

Brief Bio

Hello Everyone, and the especially the City of El Cerrito. I have lived in this community for the past 8 years, a proud member of the LGBTQIA+, and a mix of nationalities including my heritage of being Filipino and Native American. I am a graduate of San Francisco State University with a Degree in Criminal Justice and Political Science. I worked in a Rehabilitation Facility for Parolees aging from 18 to 80 years old. I taught Anger Management and Coping Skills to a group of 15-20 twice a week. Working for this organization in San Diego I was able to gain insight on what it is like for people of the community after they have left the prison system. Moving to El Cerrito I wanted to continue my passion of helping the justice system by volunteering for the California Re-Entry Program at San Quentin State Prison. There I was able to help inmates with life sentences that had earned the right to parole. Our program provided resources to life outside of prison such as rehabilitation, housing, education, building resumes, gaining proper paperwork to file for birth certificates, drivers licenses, social security cards, etc. My background to the criminal justice system is believing and understanding what works to help slow down or stop the rates of recidivism everywhere including my city of El Cerrito.


Seeing our city be in a deficit is a problem that needs to be addressed and different options need to be put onto the table. I stand with the community by supporting the Black Lives Matter movement. El Cerrito is a low crime city, but it does not mean that it hasn’t seen the same racial injustices from our police department such as the rest of the nation has. We need to talk about reworking and renaming our police division. Thirty percent of the total of a 40 million dollar budget goes to the policing and fire divisions in our community. In the city council meeting on June 16th Black Lives Matters issues were addressed but not with and an open heart and an open mind. Our police division is not trained in mental health service, substance abuse services, and they are not required to have training to deal with these types of situations. El Cerrito has a population of about 25,000 people, 13% of the population being Black and still a higher percentage of this race being scrutinized by our police division. Our police division stated they have changed in which they arrested half of the thousand arrests that they typically do in a year, but that the crime rate did not change. In order to receive this change we have to be willing to look into different avenues in this community and not just depend on the county to provides resources. These people are in our community and apart of it everyday they should not have to go to Richmond, San Pablo, or Martinez in order to receive proper resources.


Our Community involvement is so important in how our budget is worked. We are looking at cutting more resources from the community in order to have a uniformed officer with a gun show up to calls that they are not necessarily trained for. It is time for reform and I will be the voice in the City Council for a progressive change from a younger generation if I am elected.

1. What is your analysis of how the city became insolvent and what changes will you make to ensure it does not happen again?

El Cerrito has gone into a deficit because of changes that were made by our past council’s but back fired. It is described in council meetings that consideration of immediate change specifically to the majority of the budget that change cannot be a simple fix, but an elongated process. We are being asked questions by the community and we are being told that we will look at training instead of decreasing police pay or the department overall. We should have public access and live updates to know where and what the city is spending their money on, in not just the police and fire department, but every single department. I believe that in order to make a significant change we should be listening to the community and decrease all chances of systemic racism. We should not look down upon people coming into our community to have a better life. We should be a community that stands together for people because we are all human beings. We should hold the county available as well as reach out to non-profit organizations that have the training and knowledge to deal with mental health, substance abuse, and homelessness. We need cut the overtime from the fire department as well as cut the police department in half. I will fight for the answers to the community questions on why Public Building has not resumed in a timely fashion to increase building throughout our city. We should be allowing these permit to help drive our communities economic crisis.

2. How will you independently verify staff budget projections and analysis?

I will do my own research and speak to the heads of the commissions to get answers for myself and the community. I have seen all of the budget projections as well as break downs for our city’s budget from the past as well as the present. They are all ball park numbers and estimations on what should be allotted to every department in our city. Our city has come into a deficit from borrowing money to keep it afloat during the pandemic. Many issues have arisen during the pandemic that have brought into light to changing the ways in which the community feels that the money should be taken out of both the police, and fire department I plan on asking the city to enforce the police department to provide the community with live updates on all arrests, citations, or calls being made and answered. The people in our community want answers and they are constantly being deflected over the last couple of months of council meetings. I want to figure out why our fire department is recording $1.2 million in overtime and how that can be changed as quickly as possible. I do not want to cut money from recreation, and to my understanding the fees will be increased in this department in order to not have cuts. I do not personally have children, but I do understand price increases in order to keep up with the demand of the community. I mentioned in the previous question that the Public Building budget would not be a cut that would be beneficial to the city because we are denying building permits to go out, we are just cutting our community short overall.

3. Describe what you understand to be the working relationship between the City Manager and the City Council. Are there any changes you would like to see in the current culture, and if so, how would you go about it?

The City Manager to my understanding is the middle man to the city departments and the city council. I have gotten the chance to speak with Karen Pinkos our current city manager. I have listened and understood why our city is in its current state. Understanding that the pandemic shut down our city for a couple of months at minimum. Our city has been through deficits in the past, but this is causing a long lasting impression on how we have to actively make decisions on where the money is going in the budget. The community continues to ask why our city is not able to make major changes to singular departments in the budget. I stand to challenge persistently with getting more exact numbers and broken down analysis for the budget. The community deserves to be able to follow the work of the relationship between the council and and the city manager. The culture is concern and fight for the best possible outcome with inclusion of all. It is time for answers, it is time to hold everyone accountable in all departments. If the community wants to seek the knowledge of where their tax dollars are being spent they should be able to receive clear accurate answers. The City Manager and the Mayor are the heads of being the voice for the council, but I will continue to ask for progressive ways that the council can help the budget in the best ways for our community.

4. How will you evaluate the city manager’s performance and hold them accountable?

I will be consistently asking and enforcing that the City Manager be held accountable of more frequent reports of live numbers reviewed throughout every quarter of the year. We need to be able to view what is being spent per quarter and why? Our city manager is connected to every single department so she should have the best understanding as to what changes are possible and how to execute the needs for change. More conversations with Karen Pinkos directly about what the community is asking for. I am not afraid to do the research myself to figure out how to get the City Manager on board with changing the deficit, and the departments that will be effected. I will continue to be the voice of the younger generation and the question of why we cannot have the changes that the community is asking for.

5. What role do you you think short-term borrowing has in the budget? If there is no role then what is your plan to eliminate it? If there is a role then what do you see as the impact on the city’s bond rating, borrowing costs and our ability to finance other capital projects?

My understanding is that El Cerrito has borrowed 8 million to cover the budget from overspending and now to fund the city during this pandemic. To put the city into more of a deficit would not be capital gain. The role of short-term bonding does not seem realistic in the present economy. The council is currently working on a budget by cutting forecast numbers across the department by 4 million dollars off of the 40 million projected for the next year. The community is asking to cut funding from both the police and fire departments. I am in full support of making these financial changes over borrowing more money to put our city into more of a deficit during these uncertain times. During the town hall meeting is was discussed that the Public Building department had stopped during the beginning of covid and is now behind on being able to get inspections done in a timely manner. This is slowing down the building of our community and potential capital gains to replenish the funds for our city. We should concentrate on how we can adjust without contracting more positions to fill these roles, but to find the money in other departments to fund our community building. Instead of spending a million dollars on over time for the fire department we could have given more jobs to people that are certified to do building inspections, so that we can submit and approved more building permits.

6. What are the details of your plan for El Cerrito getting out of the financial situation we are in?

If I am elected to city council I plan on asking my council members why we cannot cut the pay of our police department in half, as well as rework the department with non-violent respondents to dissolve crime in our community. Why we do not have specific reports about where the money is being spent in both the police and fire departments. Why do these departments deserve to get paid more than the educators of our youth in our community? They do not and this is why I plan on cutting the police department budget in half. Cutting all overtime spending for both the police department and fire department to alleviate having to borrow more money eventually to cover the costs. Having active reports from both the police department as well as the fire department will give better insight as to how we can change both of these at a faster rate to replenish our general fund. We have to talk about necessity and follow it with numbers to support that it is essential. I am looking to give the community answers in a faster turn around time.

7. What do you see as the issue behind the over 1 million dollar amount of overtime for the Fire Department? How would you resolve this issue and keep El Cerrito fire safe.

We have to take direct action on the overtime money spent for the fire department. The percentage of money that is expended from the cities general fund is already high, it is part of the reason that our city had to borrow money. I have stated in previous questions I believe that the money could have been spent on getting the public building division into a fast turn over for our city to start generating money sooner. There are so many other departments that take the bare minimum to pay for both the fire department and the police department budget. It is time to get to to the answers of why? If I become elected to city council I am not going to take a back seat to getting answers for the community, by looking to stop overtime in both the fire and police division, as well as rework the budget for both.

8. What changes would you make with the police budget?

The police budget is too high for this small/big city of El Cerrito that we live in and the crime rate that has continued to stay the same. I am with the community that it is time for an answer to racial justice. The Police Chief is open to training, but why does it have to be trained after the fact that the person has already been hired? Should the people we have protecting our city already be screened to have this schooling and specific training to understand mental health, substance abuse, and racial justice? I will stand with reworking the police department to be lead by non-violent respondents to calls throughout the community. If the crimes are based around theft primarily because of poverty throughout the city it is time to look at how we can be held accountable to help change this in a progressive way. We are a strong community and we have been standing for our rights and beliefs against the money being spent for our police division. It is time to cut the police budget in half, if not all together. To spend 12 million dollars for an active 39 staff members of the police department is not just going to the pay checks of these members. New police cars, new military armory, or unnecessary positions being held; are these necessary purchases to be included into the cities budget? My answer to the community is no. I hope to be the steps towards immediate change for decreasing the money expended on El Cerrito’s police division.

El Cerrito Staff continue to show lack of transparency with the budget

Tomorrow September 1st at 430pm El Cerrito City Council is having a special budget meeting. They have not yet completed their 20/21 budget which started in July. For information on the meeting click here. The meeting is once again scheduled at a time that is not accessible for many residents. While I understand that some of this scheduling is due to council members’ day jobs these budget meetings must be held when people can attend them. To not do so adds to the feelings that the City Staff and Council do not want an active citizenry.

The agenda and the packet only were issued for the meeting this afternoon (August 31st). Normally these packets are issued the Thursday before the meeting. Once again a ” budget study session” is on the agenda for the meeting and once again any slides that the consultant or staff have prepared ARE NOT in the packet. So El Cerrito residents do not have adequate time to prepare comments. They have to watch the meeting and comment during the meeting.

We have long been requesting that residents see the current financial status at each meeting or at least monthly. We have also been requesting a more transparent budget process. A meeting at an inaccessible time with a packet that has no actual information in it is NOT TRANSPARENT.

I urge those that care about this city and its financial situation to send in a public comment tomorrow (better yet if you can attend and comment during the meeting). Comments can be sent to cityclerk@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us and you should state public comment agenda item 3A if you want to discuss the budget.

I would also encourage you to send comments to the City Manager and the entire City Council. If they don’t hear from us they assume we are not longer paying attention.

Karen Pinkos-City Manager kpinkos@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Greg Lyman-Mayor glyman@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Paul Fadelli Vice Mayor pfadelli@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Councilperson Pardue-Okimoto rpardueokimoto@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Councilperson Janet Abelson jabelson@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Councilperson Gabe Quinto gquinto@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us

Paul Fadelli Response to Budget Questions

As I wrote in my last post ECCFRG has asked all of the candidates a series of questions in regards to the budget crisis. Paul Fadelli sent in his response today so he is the first post to go up. We did allow each candidate a brief bio space also. The words below are all the candidate’s except for when I repeat the question. Mr. Fadelli has been on the council for 4 years and is currently Mayor Pro-Tem which means if he is re-elected he will be the Mayor. We thank Mayor Pro-Tem Fadelli for taking the time to answer our questions.

Brief Bio

I grew up in West County, going to school in El Cerrito and Richmond, and graduating from Kennedy High. I graduated college from UC Davis and got a Masters of Journalism degree from UCLA.

For more than two decades I worked for progressive Democratic legislators in the state and national capitols on a variety of policy issues. For ten years in Sacramento I was the staff director on the State Senate Committee on Energy & Public Utilities. Moving back to the Bay Area in the nineties, I was the VP at Kearns & West, a collaborative planning firm in San Francisco. Before becoming a City Councilmember in 2016, I worked for 11 years as the Manager of State & Federal Legislation at the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART).

I am married and have two daughters — one that just graduated from high school, and the other who will be entering UC graduate school in the Fall.

1. What is your analysis of how the city became insolvent and what changes will you make to ensure it does not happen again?

El Cerrito is a small community that has been proud of being a “full service” city for many years. But the City didn’t necessarily respond adequately after the recession of 2008 with service, salary or staffing cuts to stay economically viable over the long term. With few new revenue sources, important reserves were often used and eventually depleted in order to keep services and staff at status quo levels. In addition, in later years, while maintaining positive economic outlooks, the council approved (sometimes unwittingly) expenditures to pay with reserves for:
• costs associated with the abolishment of Redevelopment Agencies in the State;
• costs associated with El Cerrito becoming a Sanctuary City when the county Sheriff, in retaliation, forced the City to seek more costly dispatch service; and
• costs to establish a new temporary Senior Center when the WCCUSD would not renew the lease at the existing site at discounted rate.
Obviously more scrutiny by Council over the past decade could have brought the question of reserves and budget sustainability forward. Over many years, the past city staff leadership had developed a somewhat insular budgetary process that resulted in little scrutiny or review, until new auditors blew the whistle. I have mentioned publicly that it is not only important to have transparency on budget issues for the public, but also better transparency between staff and Council as well. There was a culture of not wanting to give councilmembers bad news.

This Council and a new City Manager have been outspoken in acknowledging the need to structurally change the budget process to grow critical reserves over time. With the additional problems associated with Covid-19, this has resulted in changing from a two-year budget process to a one-year effort where amendments can occur to respond to changing economic circumstances.

2. How will you independently verify staff budget projections and analysis?

Working my whole life for elected officials I have often dealt with budgets – mostly dealing with specific policy programs and whether or not funding amounts were appropriate or adequate with respect to my member or agency’s needs. However, with issues involving El Cerrito’s solvency I have learned electeds, need to be even more detailed in reviewing and approving city budgets. There is much to do as a councilmember. I am not an accountant and will have to still rely on professionals, staff and the public scrutiny for questions and answers. As one of the two newest Councilmembers, I believe we both felt we asked many of the right questions during council meetings (especially about Measure V revenue and the impact on reserves), but often didn’t get a detailed helpful response back at the time.

3. Describe what you understand to be the working relationship between the City Manager and the City Council. Are there any changes you would like to see in the current culture, and if so, how would you go about it?

While City Councilmembers play important roles in their cities (setting policy, voting for budgets and ordinances and ceremonial obligations), it is important to remember that most of the authority by ordinance for production of reports, draft legislation and implementation of policies belongs to the city manager. It is a significant job with many management obligations. In addition, the Brown Act, dramatically limits any discussion among Councilmembers about policy matters and often keeps councilmembers out of the loop as to what’s occurring on certain events and issues. Often Councilmembers will only hear of a problem or another councilmember’s views on a key issue at the actual meeting. It is courtesy, too, for council to notify the City Manager know ahead of time of any issues that might be brought up. So that is to their advantage.
But the separate relationship between a Councilmember and the City Manager is important. Not just in El Cerrito, but in most cities, the City Manager is the conduit through which a Councilmember must go to meet with and discuss issues with staff. A good relationship can lead to more freedom in that direction, or less if not so good. When a Councilmember rotates to being Mayor, there is more to discuss and finalize as usually the mayor gets to prioritize what will be on agendas for Council to consider. But even agendas must be based on status of staff concerns, workloads and progress. Historically too, the city manager is responsible for public safety (fire and police) and hiring and firing all staff. There is not much changing this relationship as it is in ordinance. If a council/city manager sours, councilmembers can publicly criticize staff and management and eventually bring those concerns back to any rehiring process. But this would be a failure of the system.

4. How will you evaluate the city manager’s performance and hold them accountable?

This Council set 3-4 goals for the new City Manager. We will review progress on achieving those goals when the option to renew her contract comes before us in the future.

5. What role do you you think short-term borrowing has in the budget? If there is no role then what is your plan to eliminate it? If there is a role then what do you see as the impact on the city’s bond rating, borrowing costs and our ability to finance other capital projects?

It would be great not to have to have seek and utilize short-term borrowing. It turns out that to pay the bills, El Cerrito has been using this method for some time. The negative budgetary aspect of this tool only became apparent to me and others when our new auditor raised concerns about it. It was necessary to seek another short term loan this year, and probably for one or two more years, until our budget straightens out with recent actions. It is a goal of Council not to have to seek short-term loans in the future. Bond ratings will improve for El Cerrito with that reality.

6. What are the details of your plan for El Cerrito getting out of the financial situation we are in?

Council has set the course for El Cerrito’s finances with a strategy that will eventually begin accruing reserves by 2023 or 2024 depending upon circumstances with the recession and Covid -19. The approach focuses on cuts and a 3-year recovery, so that important services residents like will not be decimated. Council approved over $600k in cuts for FY 19-20 and, for FY20-21, over $4 million has been cut from 10% across-the-board cuts in all departments, negotiated cuts with represented and unrepresented labor groups, no COLAs, a hiring freeze, keeping vacancies open, increasing management contributions to PERS, freeze car allowance payments. The next few years will be tough and lean. Council must still cut $1.5 million or more from programs before October. To me everything is still on the table as we determine what the future economic forecast looks like. I have publicly said I want to permanently get rid of the monthly car allowances. Additional services and management salaries are likewise still on the table. I have raised the concern that we can’t just cut expenditures, but have to also think about building/seeking new revenues:

  1. assisting our permit office to expedite building projects and restart housing development along San Pablo Avenue;
  2. encourage retail and workspace development at BART Plaza TOD development;
  3. determine potential revenue to have fire department charge for EMS calls to El Cerrito and Kensington residents;
  4. conduct regional lobbying to state and federal officials to secure needed local funds;
  5. consider increasing recreational fees for certain programs without reducing accessibility;
  6. consider the possibility of another cannabis dispensary (first one is still not open).

    7. What do you see as the issue behind the over 1 million dollar amount of overtime for the Fire Department? How would you resolve this issue and keep El Cerrito fire safe.

    Out of control fire overtime is an issue we have to resolve. I was hoping the state auditor would have done her review and presented facts and procedure on how to deal going forward. But the audit will not start for some time and, in the meantime I and other councilmembers, have asked for a full report and recommendation from our fire chief and city manager. Overtime when used correctly and prudently can save money when the full costs of hiring and employing personnel is considered. I think in El Cerrito overtime became a systemic way of doing business because certain employees benefitted. With circumstances in El Cerrito changing (new retirees, new PEPRA rules for PERS etc.) it may be advantageous to consider filling the vacant fire slots, which could assist fire efforts and lower overtime costs. But we will have to see what is reported back and what recommendations are made

8. What changes would you make with the police budget?

I am hoping the police budget will be an ongoing issue for some time as we move toward a broader discussion and evolution of changes in how we provide and assure safety for El Cerritans. As with every El Cerrito department, the police budget has been reduced by 10 %. In addition to the elimination of SROs, Council has reviewed other police operations which could result in the reduction of staff during the budget process. Other changes with respect to how we handle 911 calls and mental health calls may not actually help to reduce the budget…but I want to learn from other cities and be open to positive changes that encourage less confrontational incidents wherever we can.